Human Defences, Vaccination and Drug Development: Exam Drill - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

10 original exam-style questions - 5 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.

Download PDFJump to mark scheme (page 6)
« Previous: Human Defences, Vaccination and Drug DevelopmentNext: Infection and Response: Foundation Tier Practice »
Revision Library
revisionlibrary.co.uk
GCSE · Biology

B3bD Human Defences, Vaccination and Drug Development: Exam Drill

AQA 8464 · Calculator allowed · about 90 minutes
Total Marks
Name: _______________________________    Date: ____ / ____ / ______
Answer ALL questions. Show all your working.
1
Pathogens can cause disease in humans.
(a)Give the definition of the term 'pathogen'.(1)
(b)Name two types of pathogen.(2)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2
Describe two physical or chemical barriers in the human body that help prevent pathogens entering.
(a)Describe one physical barrier and how it stops pathogens.(1)
(b)Describe one chemical barrier and how it helps prevent infection.(1)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
3
Vaccination can protect individuals and populations.
(a)Explain how vaccination leads to immunity in an individual. Give the immunological steps.(3)
(Total for Question 3 is 3 marks)
4
Antibodies bind specifically to antigens.
(a)Explain what is meant by the specificity of an antibody.(1)
(b)Give one consequence of antibody specificity for vaccine design.(1)
(Total for Question 4 is 2 marks)
5
A community study recorded cases in a recent outbreak. 1 200 people received Vaccine X and 30 of these still developed the disease. In the unvaccinated group of 600 people, 60 developed the disease. Calculate the vaccine efficacy as a percentage using the formula: efficacy = (attack rate unvaccinated - attack rate vaccinated) / attack rate unvaccinated x 100.
(a)Show your working and give the vaccine efficacy to 3 significant figures.(3)
(Total for Question 5 is 3 marks)
6
Required-practical style: A student investigates the effect of different concentrations of antiseptic solution on the number of bacteria colonies growing on agar plates. Five concentrations were tested: 0% (control), 1%, 2%, 4% and 8%. For each concentration the student spread a known volume of the same bacterial suspension on three plates, applied the antiseptic, incubated for 24 hours at 25 degrees C and then counted colonies. The mean colony counts recorded were: 0% = 360, 1% = 220, 2% = 140, 4% = 80, 8% = 30. The student was careful to use the same volume each time but later realised the pipette used for the 4% plates delivered 10% less volume by accident.
(a)State two control variables the student should keep the same to make this a fair test.(2)
(b)Explain how the pipette error for the 4% plates is likely to affect the mean colony count recorded for 4% and whether this introduces bias in comparing concentrations.(2)
(c)Suggest one practical improvement the student could make to reduce the impact of such pipetting errors on the final conclusions.(1)
(Total for Question 6 is 5 marks)
7
A pharmaceutical company is developing a new antiviral. In early trials they measure the concentration of drug in the blood of volunteers at intervals. At time 0 the concentration is 12 mg per litre. After 2 hours it is 9.6 mg per litre. Assume first-order elimination and that concentration halves after a fixed time. Use the approximation that for small time intervals the percentage decrease is consistent.
(a)Calculate the percentage decrease in concentration over the 2 hours. Give your answer to 3 significant figures.(2)
(b)Using the 20.0% decrease every 2 hours as an approximation, estimate the concentration after a further 4 hours (total 6 hours). Show working and give answer to 3 significant figures.(2)
(Total for Question 7 is 4 marks)
8
Data analysis: A trial compared two dosing schedules of a vaccine: single dose and two doses given 4 weeks apart. The table shows the mean antibody titre (arbitrary units) measured 6 weeks after first dose. Single dose group mean = 30 units (n = 50, standard deviation 12). Two-dose group mean = 85 units (n = 48, standard deviation 18).
(a)State two pieces of evidence from the data that suggest the two-dose schedule produces a stronger immune response.(2)
(b)Suggest one further statistical or experimental piece of information that would help determine whether the difference is statistically significant.(2)
(Total for Question 8 is 4 marks)
9
Extended response: The development of new drugs is a lengthy process involving discovery, preclinical testing, clinical trials phases 1 to 3, and then regulatory approval and monitoring. Explain why it is important to have multiple phases of clinical trials and post-approval monitoring when developing new drugs. In your answer consider safety, efficacy, sample size, different populations and rare side effects.
(Total for Question 9 is 6 marks)
10
Error analysis: A published small study claimed that a new nasal vaccine reduced infection by 50% compared to control. The study had 20 participants in each group. In the vaccine group 6 people were infected; in the control group 12 were infected. A student comments that the study is unreliable. Explain two reasons based on the data and study design that support the student's comment.
(a)Give one reason based on sample size or variability. Refer to the numbers given.(2)
(b)Give another reason related to study design or missing information that weakens the claim.(2)
(Total for Question 10 is 4 marks)
Mark scheme · B3bD Human Defences, Vaccination and Drug Development: Exam Drill

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10