Revision Library

revisionlibrary.co.uk

A-Level · Strategy

BUS.AL25 SWOT Analysis and Choosing a Strategic Option

AQA 7132 · Calculators not allowed · about 60 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions in the spaces provided. Full sentences are required for all explain, analyse and recommend questions. Show your working for any calculation.

Riverbend Bikes is a small UK electric bicycle maker. Read the short case and assign each numbered statement to the correct SWOT quadrant: strength, weakness, opportunity or threat. Case facts: Riverbend sells 1,200 e-bikes per year, has an in-house battery design team of 6 staff, recently won a local sustainability award, lacks a national distribution network, faces a surge in imported cheap e-bikes, and sees growing UK demand for low-carbon commuting options.

(a)Statement 1: 'In-house battery design team of 6 staff.' Which SWOT quadrant?(1)

(b)Statement 2: 'Lacks a national distribution network.' Which SWOT quadrant?(1)

(c)Statement 3: 'Growing UK demand for low-carbon commuting options.' Which SWOT quadrant?(1)

(d)Statement 4: 'Surge in imported cheap e-bikes.' Which SWOT quadrant?(1)

(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)

Which one of the following best explains why SWOT groups factors into internal and external categories for strategic choice?

A) To separate short-term from long-term issues
B) To distinguish issues the business can control from those it cannot
C) To show financial ratios next to marketing data
D) To rank employees by performance

(Total for Question 2 is 1 mark)

State two internal factors, other than those in question 1, that Riverbend Bikes might list in the strengths or weaknesses quadrants when assessing its strategy.

(Total for Question 3 is 2 marks)

Explain one way Riverbend Bikes could turn the identified strength 'in-house battery design team' into a strategic advantage when competing against cheap imports.

(Total for Question 4 is 3 marks)

State two external opportunities Riverbend Bikes could seek to exploit, given the case facts of growing low-carbon commuting demand and a sustainability award.

(Total for Question 5 is 2 marks)

Explain one threat to Riverbend Bikes from the surge in imported cheap e-bikes, and how that threat might affect the firm's pricing or margins.

(Total for Question 6 is 3 marks)

Riverbend provides the following additional data to inform a SWOT: annual production 1,200 units, average selling price 1,500 pounds, gross margin per unit 400 pounds, a backlog of 300 orders awaiting better distribution, R&D tax credit available, and local competitors offering 1,000 pound imports. Using this data, write one clear point for each SWOT quadrant to include in a SWOT grid for Riverbend Bikes.

(Total for Question 7 is 6 marks)

Riverbend sold 1,200 units when the total UK e-bike market was 6,000 units. Calculate Riverbend's market share as a percentage. Show your working.

(Total for Question 8 is 2 marks)

Explain one strategic implication for Riverbend Bikes of holding a 20% market share in the UK e-bike market, using SWOT terms.

(Total for Question 9 is 3 marks)

Riverbend is considering two strategic options: Option A, invest 250,000 pounds to build a national distribution network and expand production capacity; Option B, invest 120,000 pounds in product R&D and premium branding to justify higher prices. State two pros of Option A and two pros of Option B, each as short bullet points.

(Total for Question 10 is 2 marks)

Using SWOT thinking, give two analysis points (one positive and one caution) about Option A, 'build a national distribution network and expand production capacity'.

(Total for Question 11 is 4 marks)

Riverbend's sales grow from 1,200 units to 1,560 units after a pilot marketing push. Calculate the percentage growth in units sold. Show your working.

(Total for Question 12 is 2 marks)

Explain one reason why Option B, investing in R&D and premium branding for 120,000 pounds, might be a better strategic fit with Riverbend's existing strengths than Option A.

(Total for Question 13 is 3 marks)

State two risks common to both Option A and Option B that Riverbend should consider when choosing its strategic option.

(Total for Question 14 is 2 marks)

Using the SWOT points you constructed earlier and the cost figures for each option (Option A 250,000 pounds, Option B 120,000 pounds), give one evaluative judgement comparing the options in terms of risk and speed of impact. Use one short paragraph.

(Total for Question 15 is 2 marks)

Riverbend Bikes must choose between Option A, investing 250,000 pounds to build a national distribution network and expand capacity, and Option B, investing 120,000 pounds in R&D and premium branding. Using the completed SWOT evidence from this pack, recommend which option Riverbend should choose. Justify your recommendation with balanced analysis of both options and a clear final decision.

(Total for Question 16 is 9 marks)

Mark scheme · BUS.AL25 SWOT Analysis and Choosing a Strategic Option

Question 1

(a) B1 strength, in-house technical capability
(a) Answer: Strength: in-house battery design team.
(b) B1 weakness, internal limitation in distribution
(b) Answer: Weakness: lacks a national distribution network.
(c) B1 opportunity, external positive market trend
(c) Answer: Opportunity: growing UK demand for low-carbon commuting.
(d) B1 threat, external competitive pressure
(d) Answer: Threat: surge in imported cheap e-bikes.

Question 2

B1 B cao
Answer: B

Question 3

B1 any one internal factor, e.g. skilled engineering staff, limited production capacity, strong brand locally, poor after-sales service
B1 a second internal factor, e.g. high manufacturing costs, proprietary battery IP, inexperienced senior management
Answer: Any two internal factors, for example: skilled engineering staff; limited production capacity.

Question 4

B1 identifies a use of the strength, e.g. improving battery performance or creating a longer warranty
B1 develops how this affects customers, e.g. better range or reliability compared with cheap imports
B1 links to an outcome, e.g. supports premium pricing, brand differentiation and customer loyalty
Answer: Use the in-house team to develop higher-performance, longer-lasting batteries so Riverbend offers greater range and reliability than cheap imports, allowing premium pricing and stronger customer loyalty.

Question 5

B1 identifies an opportunity, e.g. partnering with local councils on cycling schemes
B1 identifies a second opportunity, e.g. marketing the sustainability award to win corporate or commuter fleet contracts
Answer: Any two, e.g. partner with councils on low-carbon commuting schemes; use the sustainability award to win fleet or corporate contracts.

Question 6

B1 identifies a threat, e.g. price competition from cheaper imports
B1 develops the effect, e.g. downward pressure on prices or loss of sales to lower-priced rivals
B1 links to an outcome, e.g. reduced profit margins or the need to cut costs or add value to remain competitive
Answer: Cheap imports create price competition that can force Riverbend to lower prices or lose sales, which would squeeze profit margins and force cost reductions or increased investment in differentiation.

Question 7

B1 strength point referencing data, e.g. healthy gross margin per unit of 400 pounds indicating room to invest in quality
B1 weakness point referencing data, e.g. limited annual production capacity of 1,200 units and backlog of 300 indicating supply constraints
B1 opportunity point referencing data, e.g. R&D tax credit plus strong selling price gives scope to invest in battery R&D exploiting demand
B1 threat point referencing data, e.g. local competitors selling 1,000 pound imports threaten volume and price competitiveness
B1 analyse interaction, e.g. strength and opportunity combined: gross margin enables R&D investment to differentiate from imports
B1 analyse interaction, e.g. weakness and threat combined: limited capacity plus cheap imports could lead to lost market share if distribution not improved
Answer: One suitable grid entry each: Strength: 400 pound gross margin per unit gives room to invest in quality; Weakness: production 1,200 units pa and 300 unit backlog shows limited capacity; Opportunity: R&D tax credit and price point allow investment in battery R&D to exploit demand; Threat: local competitors selling 1,000 pound imports threaten volumes. Then two analysis links: margin enables R&D to differentiate, but capacity limits risk losing share to imports if distribution is not fixed.

Question 8

M1 method seen: 1,200 / 6,000
A1 20% cao
Answer: 20%.

Question 9

B1 identifies an implication, e.g. reasonably strong market position that can be leveraged
B1 develops the point in SWOT terms, e.g. as a strength it supports negotiating with distributors or attracting partners
B1 links to a strategic outcome, e.g. suggests focus on scaling distribution to convert share into higher profits before imports erode it
Answer: A 20% share is a solid position that can be treated as a strength to negotiate with distributors and partners; strategically Riverbend should scale distribution to convert market share into profit and protect it from import competition.

Question 10

B1 one pro for Option A, e.g. reduces the backlog and increases sales reach
B1 one pro for Option B, e.g. increases differentiation and allows premium pricing
Answer: Option A pro: reduces backlog and widens market reach. Option B pro: increases product differentiation and supports premium pricing.

Question 11

B1 positive analysis linked to SWOT, e.g. turns weakness (limited distribution) into strength, allowing Riverbend to fulfil backlog and grow sales
B1 positive development, e.g. increased volume can reduce average unit cost and protect margins
B1 caution linked to SWOT, e.g. high investment of 250,000 pounds increases financial risk and might be vulnerable to the threat of cheap imports
B1 caution development, e.g. if demand falls or imports undercut prices, expanded capacity could become underused and costly
Answer: Positive: Option A converts the distribution weakness into a strength, enabling backlog fulfilment and sales growth, and higher volumes could lower unit costs to protect margins. Caution: the 250,000 pound investment raises financial risk and could leave Riverbend exposed if cheap imports force prices down and capacity becomes underused.

Question 12

M1 method seen: (1,560 - 1,200) / 1,200
A1 30% cao
Answer: 30%.

Question 13

B1 identifies a reason, e.g. aligns with the in-house battery design team strength
B1 develops the reason, e.g. R&D leverages technical skills to create superior batteries and justify premium pricing
B1 links to strategic fit, e.g. lower investment compared with Option A and better defence against cheap imports through differentiation
Answer: Option B fits existing strengths because it leverages the in-house battery design team to create superior batteries, supporting premium pricing and differentiation at a lower upfront cost than Option A, helping defend against cheap imports.

Question 14

B1 risk 1, e.g. the required investment may strain cash flow
B1 risk 2, e.g. market demand could change or imports could intensify, reducing expected returns
Answer: Two risks: investment may strain cash flow; market demand could change or imports could intensify, reducing returns.

Question 15

B1 evaluative point on risk, e.g. Option A is higher cost and higher financial risk while Option B is lower cost and less risky
B1 evaluative point on speed, e.g. Option B likely gives faster product differentiation benefits while Option A may take longer to deliver sales increases through distribution
Answer: Option A carries higher financial risk because of the 250,000 pound cost and will take longer to scale distribution, whereas Option B is cheaper at 120,000 pounds, lower risk and likely to show faster benefits through product differentiation and higher margins.

Question 16

Level 1 (1-3): Offers simple, undeveloped points about Option A or Option B, with limited reference to the pack figures and no clear recommendation.
Level 2 (4-6): Provides developed analysis of one option using SWOT points and some pack figures, or compares both options but with limited evaluation and an unclear recommendation.
Level 3 (7-9): Compares both options using SWOT evidence and the pack figures, weighs risks and benefits clearly, and gives a justified recommendation with a concise final decision linked to the SWOT analysis.
Indicative content:
- Use strengths such as the in-house battery design team and 400 pound gross margin to argue for Option B, where R&D leverages technical skill and margin to create differentiation and justify higher prices.
- Use weaknesses such as limited production capacity and 300 unit backlog to argue for Option A, which addresses supply constraints and could increase sales if distribution is improved.
- Consider opportunities: growing UK demand and R&D tax credits make both options plausible; Option B can exploit demand faster through premium positioning, Option A can capture more volume if demand is financed.
- Consider threats: surge in cheap imports makes differentiation important; Option B directly addresses this by increasing product value, while Option A risks building capacity that imports can undercut unless Riverbend also differentiates.
- Consider costs and risk: Option A costs 250,000 pounds and increases financial exposure; Option B costs 120,000 pounds and is less risky, with faster potential payback through higher margins.
- Judgement might balance whether Riverbend prioritises volume growth and long-term scale (Option A) or quicker defence through differentiation and margin improvement (Option B). A strong conclusion will choose one option and justify it using the SWOT links above.

SWOT Analysis and Choosing a Strategic Option - Worksheets, Questions and Revision