Porter's Five Forces and Competitive Strategy - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

15 original exam-style questions - 2 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.

Download PDF Jump to mark scheme (page 3)Porter's Five Forces and Competitive Strategy revision guide

This topic is chapter 2 of A Level Business: Decision making to improve performance and global business Practice Book.

Next in this strand

BUS.AL5 Porter's Five Forces and Competitive Strategy

AQA 7132 · Calculators not allowed · about 50 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions in the spaces provided. Use full sentences for the longer 'apply' and 'assess/recommend' questions. Show working where appropriate. The SuperShop case details given in several prompts are fictional and provided for use in applied questions.

Identify the Porter's Five Force described as 'the threat posed by rival firms currently competing in the same market for the same customers'. Apply this to a supermarket market.

A) Threat of new entrants
B) Bargaining power of suppliers
C) Competitive rivalry
D) Threat of substitutes

(Total for Question 1 is 1 mark)

Identify one way in which buyers in a supermarket market can exercise strong bargaining power.

(Total for Question 2 is 1 mark)

Identify one example of supplier power that could affect prices at UK supermarkets.

(Total for Question 3 is 1 mark)

Identify one example of a substitute that could reduce demand for supermarket grocery purchases in the UK.

(Total for Question 4 is 1 mark)

Identify one strategic action a supermarket could take to respond to strong competitive rivalry in its market.

(Total for Question 5 is 1 mark)

Identify one substitute to supermarket shopping that is strengthened by digital technology.

(Total for Question 6 is 1 mark)

Identify one factor that increases supplier bargaining power in a supermarket supply chain.

(Total for Question 7 is 1 mark)

Define the Porter's Five Force 'threat of new entrants' and give one brief example relevant to UK supermarkets.

(Total for Question 8 is 2 marks)

SuperShop is a fictional UK supermarket chain with moderate market share, strong private-label lines, and recent investment in online ordering. State two barriers to entry that help protect SuperShop from new local competitors.

(Total for Question 9 is 2 marks)

Identify one reason why the threat of new entrants into the supermarket market might be low even if barriers are moderate, using the SuperShop context.

(Total for Question 10 is 1 mark)

Identify one way intense price rivalry between supermarkets could affect SuperShop's long term strategy.

(Total for Question 11 is 1 mark)

Identify which Porter's Five Force is most directly concerned when customers can easily switch to online meal-kit subscriptions, and explain the choice in one line.

(Total for Question 12 is 1 mark)

Explain one way SuperShop's investment in online ordering could reduce the bargaining power of buyers in its local market.

(Total for Question 13 is 3 marks)

Explain one way SuperShop's strong private-label ranges could reduce the bargaining power of suppliers.

(Total for Question 14 is 3 marks)

Assess the competitive pressures facing SuperShop in the UK supermarket market, using Porter's Five Forces and the case details given about SuperShop (moderate market share, strong private-label lines, recent investment in online ordering). Recommend which generic strategy, cost leadership or differentiation, SuperShop should prioritise. Make a clear, supported judgement.

(Total for Question 15 is 16 marks)

Mark scheme · BUS.AL5 Porter's Five Forces and Competitive Strategy

Question 1

B1 C cao
Answer: C

Question 2

B1 identifies a valid example such as buyers switching supermarkets to get lower prices or better promotions
Answer: Buyers can switch to rival supermarkets that offer lower prices or better promotions.

Question 3

B1 identifies a valid example such as a major supplier increasing wholesale prices or restricting supply
Answer: A major food supplier increasing wholesale prices or restricting deliveries to supermarkets.

Question 4

B1 identifies a valid substitute such as meal-kit delivery services, takeaway meal apps, or local convenience stores
Answer: Online meal-kit delivery services that let customers avoid supermarket grocery shopping.

Question 5

B1 identifies a valid action such as price competition, loyalty schemes, cost reduction, or differentiation of services
Answer: Introduce or enhance a loyalty scheme to retain customers and reduce the impact of price-led rivalry.

Question 6

B1 identifies a substitute such as online meal-kit services or food delivery apps
Answer: Online meal-kit services delivered to the home, enabled by digital ordering platforms.

Question 7

B1 identifies factor such as few alternative suppliers, supplier concentration, or uniqueness of product
Answer: Supplier concentration, where a small number of large suppliers control key products, increases supplier bargaining power.

Question 8

B1 definition: factors that determine how easily new firms can start competing in a market
B1 an example such as high set-up costs for stores and distribution, or strong brand loyalty
Answer: The threat of new entrants is how easily new firms can enter and compete in a market, for example high set-up costs for store networks and distribution that deter new supermarket chains.

Question 9

B1 high initial capital costs for stores and distribution networks
B1 brand loyalty and established private-label lines reducing customers willingness to switch
Answer: High initial capital costs for stores and distribution networks; and brand loyalty supported by SuperShop's strong private-label range.

Question 10

B1 identifies a reason such as incumbent scale economies or access to prime store locations making entry unattractive
Answer: Incumbent scale economies and difficulty accessing prime store locations make market entry unattractive despite moderate barriers.

Question 11

B1 identifies an effect such as shifting strategy towards cost leadership, margin reduction, or focus on efficiency
Answer: SuperShop may pursue a cost leadership strategy to protect margins by reducing costs and competing on price over the long term.

Question 12

B1 identifies threat of substitutes and links it to meal-kits being an alternative to supermarket shopping
Answer: Threat of substitutes, since online meal-kit subscriptions offer a different solution that reduces demand for supermarket grocery shopping.

Question 13

B1 identifies a way, e.g. online ordering increases convenience and loyalty
B1 develops the point, e.g. customers may value delivery slots or loyalty points and be less willing to switch stores
B1 links to outcome, e.g. this weakens buyer bargaining power because buyers have higher switching costs or prefer SuperShop services
Answer: Online ordering increases convenience and loyalty, for example through delivery slots and loyalty benefits, so customers face higher switching costs and are less likely to shop elsewhere, reducing their bargaining power.

Question 14

B1 identifies a way, e.g. private-label reduces dependence on major branded suppliers
B1 develops the point, e.g. SuperShop can switch to its own branded products if a branded supplier raises prices
B1 links to outcome, e.g. this weakens supplier power because suppliers fear losing volume to SuperShop own-label alternatives
Answer: Private-label ranges reduce dependence on branded suppliers, since SuperShop can substitute its own products if a supplier raises prices, which weakens supplier bargaining power by threatening suppliers with lost volume.

Question 15

Level 1 (1-4): Makes general, undeveloped statements about competitive pressures or strategy with little use of SuperShop facts and no clear judgement.
Level 2 (5-8): Identifies relevant forces and offers some application to SuperShop, with limited analysis and a tentative recommendation.
Level 3 (9-12): Analyses several of Porter's forces applied to SuperShop using the case details, discusses implications for competition and gives a reasoned recommendation.
Level 4 (13-16): Provides a sustained, balanced analysis of all five forces applied to SuperShop, considers strategic options and trade offs, and reaches a well supported, justified recommendation linking evidence to implications.
Indicative content:
- Competitive rivalry: existing supermarkets compete on price, range and convenience; SuperShop faces strong rivalry because of many national and local competitors, so margins may be under pressure.
- Buyer power: customers can easily switch between supermarkets and online options; SuperShop's online ordering and loyalty schemes can reduce buyer power by increasing switching costs.
- Supplier power: SuperShop's strong private-label ranges reduce dependence on large branded suppliers and weaken supplier power; however, some suppliers may still be concentrated and able to push up wholesale prices.
- Threat of new entrants: barriers such as capital costs, distribution networks and brand loyalty reduce the threat, helping SuperShop maintain market position despite only moderate market share.
- Threat of substitutes: online meal-kits and food delivery apps are realistic substitutes that digital adoption strengthens; SuperShop's investment in online ordering helps it counter this threat.
- Implications for strategy: cost leadership is appropriate where price rivalry is intense and margins need protecting, and SuperShop's private-label strength and scale economies support cost-based approaches; differentiation is appropriate where added services, convenience and unique products reduce price sensitivity and create loyalty, and SuperShop's online capability offers routes to differentiate.
- Recommendation and judgement: a combined strategic emphasis may be best, but a clear priority should be stated and justified, for example prioritise differentiation through superior online convenience, targeted private-label premium ranges and loyalty benefits if SuperShop believes customers value service and convenience, or prioritise cost leadership and further private-label expansion if immediate margin protection is essential given local price competition.
- Consider trade offs: differentiation may require investment and risk of low uptake; cost leadership may erode perceived quality and make SuperShop vulnerable to suppliers if price competition intensifies.

Porter's Five Forces and Competitive Strategy - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

Next in this strand

Related topics

BUS.AL5 Porter's Five Forces and Competitive Strategy

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12

Question 13

Question 14

Question 15

Mark your answers

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12

Question 13

Question 14

Question 15