Money Management and Decision-Making in Couple Relationships - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

12 original exam-style questions - 4 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.

Download PDF Jump to mark scheme (page 5)Money Management and Decision-Making in Couple Relationships revision guide

This topic is chapter 3 of GCSE Sociology: Families Practice Book 2.

Next in this strand

3.10 Money Management and Decision-Making in Couple Relationships

AQA 8192 · about 65 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions. Write full sentences for questions worth 4 marks or more. Spend about 80 minutes in total.

Explain two criticisms of the view that pooling household money automatically means equal control between partners.

(Total for Question 1 is 6 marks)

Give one example of a strength of pooling for household budgeting in the context of paying monthly rent.

(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)

State one criticism of the allowance system of money management for couples, in the context of personal freedom.

(Total for Question 3 is 2 marks)

Define 'money management' in the context of couple relationships and household economics.

(Total for Question 4 is 2 marks)

Compare pooling and the allowance system, identifying one clear difference in how decision-making responsibility is organised in each.

(Total for Question 5 is 4 marks)

In the context of studies of couple finances and Pahl and Vogler's typology, discuss how far sociologists would agree that pooling household money leads to equal control between partners. Use different sociological perspectives and evidence in your answer, and reach a supported conclusion.

Discuss how far sociologists would agree that pooling household money leads to equal control between partners.

(Total for Question 6 is 12 marks)

Define the term 'whole-wage system' as it is used in studies of money management in couple relationships.

(Total for Question 7 is 2 marks)

Identify and explain one feature of the independent management system of household finances, as used by some modern UK couples.

(Total for Question 8 is 4 marks)

Identify and explain one possible advantage of pooling household income for budgeting in a two-earner UK couple.

(Total for Question 9 is 4 marks)

Identify and explain one way that pooling household money might still allow unequal control between partners, as discussed by sociologists.

(Total for Question 10 is 4 marks)

Describe one way major financial decisions, such as buying a car or a house, are commonly made in couple relationships in the UK.

(Total for Question 11 is 3 marks)

Identify and explain two reasons why one partner might control household finances, even when both partners work.

(Total for Question 12 is 4 marks)

Mark scheme · 3.10 Money Management and Decision-Making in Couple Relationships

Question 1

B1 identifies first criticism, e.g. unequal contribution can give one partner more influence
B1 develops first criticism, e.g. the partner who contributes more may dominate decisions even when money is pooled
B1 identifies second criticism, e.g. control of the bank account or access can concentrate power
B1 develops second criticism, e.g. the partner who manages the account can decide spending timing and hide information, limiting the other's input
B1 provides an additional linked point, e.g. gender norms and perceived financial expertise often shape who actually makes decisions
B1 further development, e.g. sociological studies find pooling can coexist with unequal decision-making due to these practical and cultural factors
Answer: One criticism is that unequal contributions to a pooled account can give the higher earner more influence, so pooling does not remove the power that comes with larger contributions. A second criticism is that whoever controls the bank account or access to its information can concentrate decision-making power, deciding timing of payments or hiding details; combined with gender norms and perceived financial expertise, pooling often coexists with unequal decision-making.

Question 2

B1 gives a correct example, e.g. pooling ensures rent is paid from a combined fund so responsibility is shared
B1 brief development, e.g. this reduces the risk of missed payments and spreads the cost between partners
Answer: Pooling ensures rent is paid from a combined fund so responsibility is shared, which reduces the risk of missed payments and spreads the cost between partners.

Question 3

B1 identifies a criticism, e.g. the allowance system can restrict the receiver's personal spending choices
B1 brief development, e.g. because the allowance is limited and decided by the other partner, reducing financial autonomy
Answer: A criticism is that the allowance system can restrict the receiver's personal spending choices because the allowance is limited and decided by the other partner, reducing financial autonomy.

Question 4

B1 identifies that money management is how partners handle income, savings and spending within the household
B1 development, e.g. includes systems like pooling, allowance, whole-wage or independent accounts and decisions about bills and purchases
Answer: Money management is how partners handle income, savings and spending within the household, including systems like pooling, allowance, whole-wage or independent accounts and decisions about bills and purchases.

Question 5

B1 identifies a difference, e.g. pooling combines incomes while allowance separates a main earner's control from a set amount to the other partner
B1 explains how pooling affects responsibility, e.g. joint responsibility for household bills and decisions from a shared account
B1 explains how allowance affects responsibility, e.g. the controlling partner decides the allowance and often retains control of major spending
B1 links difference to decision-making consequences, e.g. pooling can encourage shared day-to-day decisions but allowance can centralise control with one partner
Answer: A key difference is that pooling combines incomes into a joint account for shared responsibility, encouraging joint decisions about day-to-day household spending, whereas the allowance system gives one partner a set amount while the other controls the main funds and decisions, centralising control.

Question 6

Level 1 (1-3): Simple statements about pooling with little or no evidence or sociological explanation, and a weak or no conclusion.
Level 2 (4-6): Some relevant knowledge and description of pooling, with limited sociological explanation. May offer one perspective or simple evidence, and a basic conclusion.
Level 3 (7-9): Clear sociological knowledge with at least two perspectives or reasons, balanced explanation and supported judgements. Some use of evidence or examples and a developed conclusion.
Level 4 (10-12): Thorough and balanced discussion drawing on several sociological perspectives and evidence. Clear evaluation of the claim that pooling leads to equality, including limitations of evidence, and a well-argued, supported conclusion.
Indicative content:
- Describe Pahl and Vogler's idea of pooling where partners combine incomes into a joint account for household spending.
- Argument that pooling can promote equality, by making both partners responsible for household costs, encouraging negotiation and shared budgeting decisions.
- Counter-argument that pooling does not guarantee equal control: unequal contributions can grant greater influence to the higher earner, and the partner who controls the account or handles paperwork can dominate decisions.
- Sociological perspectives: feminist view emphasising unequal power relations and gendered control even within pooling; functionalist or consensus-leaning points that pooling reflects cooperation and shared roles in modern families.
- Empirical evidence and examples: cases where pooled accounts coexist with one partner making major financial decisions, and examples where joint accounts are used successfully for shared goals.
- Methodological cautions: small qualitative studies may show detail about control but lack representativeness; surveys may show pooling is common yet cannot explain who actually decides.
- Evaluation of whether pooling leads to equality, weighing practical control, cultural norms and economic contributions, and concluding that while pooling can reduce some inequalities, sociologists generally conclude it does not automatically produce equal control without broader changes in earnings, access and gender norms.
- Supported conclusion that pooling may be a step towards shared responsibility for some couples, but on balance many sociologists argue pooling alone is insufficient to ensure equal control.

Question 7

B1 identifies the whole-wage system as where one partner, usually the male, brings home their entire wage to be controlled by the other partner
B1 development, e.g. the other partner then manages household spending and gives an allowance back to the earner or both
Answer: A whole-wage system is where one partner brings home their entire wage and the other partner controls household spending, often giving an allowance back to the earner.

Question 8

B1 identifies a correct feature, e.g. each partner keeps and manages their own income separately
B1 explains why this is a feature, e.g. partners pay for their own personal expenses and may split shared bills
B1 additional development, e.g. this maintains financial autonomy for each partner
B1 further explanation of consequences, e.g. it can make joint budgeting harder but supports independence and individual choice
Answer: Independent management means each partner keeps and manages their own income, paying personal expenses while possibly sharing some bills; this gives financial autonomy but can make joint budgeting harder.

Question 9

B1 identifies an advantage, e.g. easier budgeting for shared expenses such as rent, food and utilities
B1 explains how it works, e.g. combining incomes into one account simplifies paying joint bills from the same source
B1 additional development, e.g. the couple can plan savings and priorities together
B1 further development linking to equality or cooperation, e.g. pooling can encourage shared responsibility for the household
Answer: Pooling can make budgeting easier for shared expenses because combining incomes into one account simplifies paying joint bills; it also allows couples to plan savings and priorities together and encourages shared responsibility.

Question 10

B1 identifies a correct way, e.g. one partner may still make the major decisions about spending even if money is pooled
B1 explains why, e.g. because that partner controls the bank account, keeps financial records or has higher earning power
B1 additional development, e.g. social norms about gender and decision-making can mean the higher earner or the partner seen as financially knowledgeable leads decisions
B1 further link to inequality, e.g. this can mean pooling does not automatically equal shared control over major financial choices
Answer: Even when money is pooled one partner may still make major spending decisions because they control the account, keep the records or earn more; gender norms or perceived financial expertise can lead that partner to dominate choices, so pooling does not guarantee equal control.

Question 11

B1 identifies a how, e.g. decisions are sometimes made jointly after discussion
B1 development, e.g. partners may negotiate priorities and compromise on large purchases
B1 further development or example, e.g. alternatively decisions can be led by the higher earner or the partner with more financial knowledge
Answer: Major financial decisions are often made jointly after discussion, with partners negotiating priorities and compromising on large purchases; sometimes the higher earner or the partner with more financial knowledge leads the decision.

Question 12

B1 identifies reason 1, e.g. one partner earns significantly more
B1 explains reason 1, e.g. higher earner can claim greater say in spending and saving decisions
B1 identifies reason 2, e.g. one partner has responsibility for paying bills and record keeping
B1 explains reason 2, e.g. control of paperwork and accounts gives practical power over when and how money is spent
Answer: One partner might control finances because they earn significantly more and therefore claim greater say over spending and saving; another reason is that one partner manages bills and paperwork, which gives them practical control over timing and allocation of funds.

Money Management and Decision-Making in Couple Relationships - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

Next in this strand

Related topics

3.10 Money Management and Decision-Making in Couple Relationships

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12

Mark your answers

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12