Admissions tests / ESAT / Maths 1 / Ratio, proportion and rates of change
Foundation. 15 questions, 15 marks, about 22 minutes.
ESAT Mathematics 1: Ratio, proportion and rates of change, set 1
Scale factors and diagrams, ratio notation and division in a ratio, percentages, direct and inverse proportion, growth and decay, and compound measures.
Download the questions (PDF) Download with worked solutions (PDF)
- Answer all questions. No calculator.
- Each question has exactly one correct answer.
- 11 mark
Write the ratio 56 : 42 : 70 in its simplest form.
- 21 mark
195 pounds is shared between Amir, Priya and Dev in the ratio 2 : 3 : 8. How much does Dev receive?
- 31 mark
A map has a scale of 1 : 25000. Two villages are 8 cm apart on the map. What is the actual distance between them, in kilometres?
- 41 mark
A boy is 156 cm tall and his younger sister is 120 cm tall. Express the boy's height as a fraction of his sister's height, giving your answer in its simplest form.
- 51 mark
A shade of green paint is made by mixing blue and yellow paint in the ratio 3 : 5. A customer wants to make 640 ml of this shade. How much yellow paint is needed?
- 61 mark
In a class, 2/5 of the students are boys and the rest are girls. Express the ratio of boys to girls in its simplest form.
- 71 mark
After a 20% pay rise, a worker's new hourly wage is 14.40 pounds. What was the wage before the rise?
- 81 mark
y is directly proportional to x. When x = 8, y = 20. Which equation correctly gives y in terms of x?
- 91 mark
The cost, C pounds, of printing n leaflets is directly proportional to n. It costs 18 pounds to print 240 leaflets. How much does it cost to print 360 leaflets?
- 101 mark
The time, T hours, taken to fill a tank is inversely proportional to the number of pumps used, p. Using 4 pumps takes 9 hours. How long would it take using 6 pumps?
- 111 mark
Two similar cylinders have radii in the ratio 2 : 3. The volume of the smaller cylinder is 64 cm^3. What is the volume of the larger cylinder?
- 121 mark
800 pounds is invested for 2 years at 5% compound interest per year. What is the value of the investment at the end of the 2 years?
- 131 mark
Calculate the simple interest earned on 600 pounds invested for 4 years at a rate of 3% per year.
- 141 mark
The energy stored in a spring, E, is directly proportional to the square of its extension, x. When x = 3 cm, E = 18 J. What is E when x = 6 cm?
- 151 mark
Triangle ABC is similar to triangle PQR, with AB corresponding to PQ and AC corresponding to PR. AB = 6 cm, PQ = 15 cm and AC = 8 cm. What is the length of PR?
Worked solutions
Every question below carries the reasoning, not just the answer. The official material for this test publishes a correct option letter and nothing else.
Question 1Answer: B
- Write each term as a product of primes: 56 = 2^3 x 7, 42 = 2 x 3 x 7, 70 = 2 x 5 x 7.
- The factors common to all three terms are 2 and 7, so the highest common factor is 2 x 7 = 14.
- Divide every term by 14: 56/14 = 4, 42/14 = 3, 70/14 = 5.
- The ratio in its simplest form, keeping the original order, is 4 : 3 : 5, so the answer is B.
- Why not A: Divides each term by 2, which is a common factor, but not the highest common factor of 14, so the ratio is not fully simplified.
- Why not C: Reaches the correct three numbers but writes them in the wrong order, which changes what the ratio represents.
- Why not D: Divides each term by 7, another common factor, but again stops short of dividing by the full highest common factor of 14.
Question 2Answer: D
- The ratio 2 : 3 : 8 has 2 + 3 + 8 = 13 total parts.
- One part is therefore worth 195/13 = 15 pounds.
- Dev's share is 8 parts, so Dev receives 8 x 15 = 120 pounds.
- The answer is D.
- Why not A: Divides 195 equally between the three people (195/3), ignoring the given ratio altogether.
- Why not B: Correctly finds the value of one part as 15, but then multiplies by Priya's share of 3 instead of Dev's share of 8.
- Why not C: Miscalculates the value of one part, treating 195/13 as 12 rather than 15, then scales up by Dev's share of 8.
Question 3Answer: A
- The scale 1 : 25000 means 1 cm on the map represents 25000 cm in real life.
- The map distance is 8 cm, so the actual distance is 8 x 25000 = 200000 cm.
- Convert to kilometres using 1 km = 100000 cm: 200000 / 100000 = 2.
- The actual distance is 2 km, so the answer is A.
- Why not B: Converts centimetres to kilometres using 1 km = 10000 cm instead of the correct 100000 cm, giving an answer ten times too large.
- Why not C: Treats the actual distance in centimetres as if it were already in metres, then converts that figure to kilometres, skipping the centimetre-to-metre step.
- Why not D: Divides by 1000000 to convert to kilometres, one power of ten too many, giving an answer ten times too small.
Question 4Answer: C
- The boy's height as a fraction of his sister's height is 156/120.
- 156 = 2^2 x 3 x 13 and 120 = 2^3 x 3 x 5, so their highest common factor is 2^2 x 3 = 12.
- Dividing numerator and denominator by 12 gives 156/12 = 13 and 120/12 = 10.
- The boy's height is 13/10 of his sister's height, so the answer is C.
- Why not A: Divides the sister's height by the boy's height instead of the boy's height by the sister's, inverting the fraction that was asked for.
- Why not B: Reaches 39/30 by dividing both terms by 4, a common factor, but not the highest common factor of 12, so the fraction is not fully simplified.
- Why not D: Uses the 36 cm difference in height as the numerator instead of the boy's own height of 156 cm.
Question 5Answer: B
- The ratio of blue to yellow paint is 3 : 5, giving 3 + 5 = 8 total parts.
- One part is therefore 640/8 = 80 ml.
- Yellow paint corresponds to 5 parts, so the yellow paint needed is 5 x 80 = 400 ml.
- The answer is B.
- Why not A: Correctly finds the amount of blue paint (3 parts) rather than the yellow paint (5 parts) that the question asks for.
- Why not C: Finds the value of one part using an incorrect total of 5 (forgetting to add blue's 3 parts to it), and stops there without multiplying by yellow's share of 5.
- Why not D: Splits the paint into two equal halves, 320 ml and 320 ml, ignoring the given ratio entirely.
Question 6Answer: A
- Boys are 2/5 of the class, so girls make up 1 - 2/5 = 3/5 of the class.
- The ratio of boys to girls is therefore 2/5 : 3/5.
- Multiplying both sides by 5 to clear the denominators gives 2 : 3.
- 2 and 3 share no common factor, so this is already in simplest form, and the answer is A.
- Why not B: Writes the ratio directly from the boys' fraction 2/5 as '2 : 5', without first working out that girls make up 3/5 of the class.
- Why not C: Correctly works out the fractions 2/5 and 3/5 but writes the ratio girls to boys instead of the boys to girls ratio asked for.
- Why not D: Treats the whole class, written as 5, and the girls' numerator, 3, as the two sides of the ratio, instead of comparing the boys' and girls' fractions directly.
Question 7Answer: C
- A 20% pay rise means the new wage is 120% of the original, so new wage = 1.20 x original wage.
- Rearranging, the original wage = new wage / 1.20 = 14.40 / 1.20.
- 14.40 / 1.20 = 1440 / 120 = 12.
- The original wage was 12.00 pounds, so the answer is C.
- Why not A: Finds 20% of the new wage (2.88 pounds) and subtracts it from 14.40, rather than dividing by the multiplier 1.20.
- Why not B: Adds 20% of the new wage back on, treating the new wage as though it still needed to be increased.
- Why not D: Subtracts 0.20 as if it were an amount in pounds rather than a percentage of the wage.
Question 8Answer: B
- Direct proportion means y = kx for some constant k.
- Substituting x = 8 and y = 20 gives 20 = k x 8, so k = 20/8.
- 20/8 simplifies to 5/2, which is 2.5.
- The equation is y = 2.5x, so the answer is B.
- Why not A: Assumes the relationship needs an added constant term, rather than recognising direct proportion as a straight line through the origin.
- Why not C: Finds the constant of proportionality as x/y = 8/20 = 0.4 instead of y/x = 20/8, inverting the ratio.
- Why not D: Miscalculates 20 divided by 8, arriving at 4 rather than the correct value of 2.5.
Question 9Answer: A
- Cost is directly proportional to the number of leaflets, so C = kn for some constant k.
- Using C = 18 when n = 240 gives k = 18/240 = 3/40.
- For n = 360, C = (3/40) x 360 = 3 x 9 = 27.
- The cost is 27 pounds, so the answer is A.
- Why not B: Sets up the proportion backwards, calculating 18 x 240/360, as if cost decreased with more leaflets rather than increasing with them.
- Why not C: Correctly finds the extra cost for the additional 120 leaflets (9 pounds) but forgets to add this to the original 18 pounds.
- Why not D: Rounds the scale factor 360/240 up to 2 instead of using its exact value of 1.5, doubling the cost instead of scaling it correctly.
Question 10Answer: D
- Inverse proportion means T = k/p for some constant k.
- Using T = 9 when p = 4 gives k = 9 x 4 = 36.
- For p = 6, T = 36/6 = 6.
- It would take 6 hours, so the answer is D.
- Why not A: Treats T and p as directly proportional, scaling 9 hours up by 6/4 to get 13.5, instead of using the inverse relationship.
- Why not B: Assumes a constant saving of 9/4 = 2.25 hours for each extra pump, giving a linear rather than inverse relationship between time and pumps.
- Why not C: Assumes each of the 2 extra pumps saves exactly 1 hour, subtracting a flat 2 hours from the original 9 rather than applying inverse proportion.
Question 11Answer: C
- For similar solids, volumes scale with the cube of the linear scale factor.
- The radii are in ratio 2 : 3, so the linear scale factor from the smaller to the larger cylinder is 3/2.
- The volume scale factor is (3/2)^3 = 27/8.
- The larger volume is 64 x 27/8 = 8 x 27 = 216 cm^3, so the answer is C.
- Why not A: Scales the volume by the linear radius ratio 3/2 directly, without cubing it as volumes of similar solids require.
- Why not B: Scales the volume by the squared ratio (3/2)^2, as if finding a scaled area rather than a scaled volume.
- Why not D: Computes 3^3 as 3 x 3 = 9 rather than 3 x 3 x 3 = 27, understating the volume scale factor as 9/8 instead of 27/8.
Question 12Answer: B
- Compound interest means each year's interest is calculated on the new balance, so the multiplier for one year is 1.05.
- After year 1: 800 x 1.05 = 840.
- After year 2: 840 x 1.05 = 882.
- The investment is worth 882 pounds, so the answer is B.
- Why not A: Applies the 5% interest for one year only, forgetting to compound for the second year.
- Why not C: Uses simple interest, adding 5% of the original 800 pounds (40 pounds) in each of the two years, rather than compounding on the new balance.
- Why not D: In the second year, applies 5% to only the first year's interest of 40 pounds rather than to the whole new balance of 840 pounds.
Question 13Answer: A
- Simple interest is calculated only on the original principal each year, using I = Prt/100.
- Here P = 600, r = 3 and t = 4.
- I = (600 x 3 x 4)/100 = 7200/100 = 72.
- The simple interest earned is 72 pounds, so the answer is A.
- Why not B: Calculates the interest for a single year only (600 x 3/100 = 18) and forgets to multiply by the 4 years invested.
- Why not C: Finds the total amount in the account, principal plus interest, rather than the interest alone that the question asks for.
- Why not D: Forgets to divide by 100 when applying the percentage rate, treating 3% as a factor of 3 rather than 0.03.
Question 14Answer: D
- E is proportional to x^2, so E = kx^2 for some constant k.
- Using E = 18 when x = 3 gives 18 = k x 3^2 = 9k, so k = 2.
- When x = 6, E = 2 x 6^2 = 2 x 36 = 72.
- The answer is D.
- Why not A: Assumes E is directly (linearly) proportional to x, so doubling x from 3 to 6 simply doubles E from 18 to 36.
- Why not B: Finds the constant using k = 18/3 = 6, as if E = kx, rather than the correct k = 18/9 = 2 from E = kx^2, then still squares x correctly and calculates E = 6 x 6^2 = 216.
- Why not C: Correctly finds k = 2 from E = kx^2, but then calculates E = 2 x 6 = 12, forgetting to square x again in the final step.
Question 15Answer: C
- Since the triangles are similar with AB corresponding to PQ, the scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle PQR is PQ/AB = 15/6 = 5/2.
- AC corresponds to PR, so PR = AC x scale factor.
- PR = 8 x 5/2 = 20.
- The length of PR is 20 cm, so the answer is C.
- Why not A: Forms the scale factor as AB/PQ = 6/15 instead of PQ/AB = 15/6, inverting which triangle is being scaled up to which.
- Why not B: Treats the similarity as additive, adding the fixed difference of 9 cm between AB and PQ onto AC, rather than multiplying by a common scale factor.
- Why not D: Rounds the scale factor 15/6 = 2.5 up to 3 before multiplying, an arithmetic slip that overstates the scaled length.
More free ESAT practice
Every strand of the published ESAT specification, with worked solutions throughout.