Answer ALL questions in the spaces provided. Show your working for every calculation: method marks are available even if your final answer is wrong. Larkspur Skincare, used throughout this pack, is a fictional business.
1
Which one of the following best describes a 'channel of distribution'?
A) The route a product takes from the producer to the final customer
B) The stages a product's sales pass through, from launch to decline
C) The amount a business charges customers for a product
D) The combination of product, price, place and promotion decisions
(Total for Question 1 is 1 mark)
2
State the difference between a direct and an indirect distribution channel.
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
3
State two examples of intermediaries that can appear in a distribution channel.
(Total for Question 3 is 2 marks)
4
Larkspur Skincare sells its face cream to customers at a retail price of £20.00. Selling direct online, the production cost is £6.00 per unit and delivery costs a further £2.00 per unit. Calculate Larkspur Skincare's profit per unit when sold direct online. Show your working.
(Total for Question 4 is 2 marks)
5
When sold via a retailer instead, Larkspur Skincare sells the face cream to the retailer at a wholesale price of £12.00 per unit (the retailer then resells it to customers at the same £20.00 retail price, and the retailer covers delivery to its own stores). The production cost remains £6.00 per unit. Calculate Larkspur Skincare's profit per unit when sold via a retailer. Show your working.
(Total for Question 5 is 2 marks)
6
In one month, Larkspur Skincare sells 3,000 units direct online and 7,000 units via retailers, a total of 10,000 units. Calculate the percentage of Larkspur Skincare's total units sold through each channel.
(a)Calculate the percentage of total units sold direct online. Show your working.(2)
(b)Calculate the percentage of total units sold via retailers, and confirm both percentages add up to 100%. Show your working.(2)
(Total for Question 6 is 4 marks)
7
Using your answers to questions 5 and 6b, calculate Larkspur Skincare's total profit from retailer sales that month. Show your working.
(Total for Question 7 is 2 marks)
8
Using your answers to questions 7 and 12, calculate Larkspur Skincare's total profit across both channels that month. Show your working.
(Total for Question 8 is 2 marks)
9
Explain one risk to Larkspur Skincare of relying only on direct online distribution.
(Total for Question 9 is 2 marks)
10
Larkspur Skincare, a fictional skincare product company, sells its face cream both directly to customers through its own website and indirectly through retailers. Explain one advantage to Larkspur Skincare of selling direct to customers online.
(Total for Question 10 is 3 marks)
11
Explain one advantage to Larkspur Skincare of selling via retailers instead.
(Total for Question 11 is 3 marks)
12
Using your answers to questions 4 and 6a, calculate Larkspur Skincare's total profit from direct online sales that month. Show your working.
(Total for Question 12 is 2 marks)
13
Calculate the total profit Larkspur Skincare would have made if all 10,000 units had instead been sold direct online at £12.00 profit per unit, and calculate how much more profit this would represent compared with your answer to question 8. Show your working.
(Total for Question 13 is 3 marks)
14
Given the extra profit potential calculated in question 13, explain one reason Larkspur Skincare might still choose to sell most of its units through retailers rather than shifting entirely to direct online sales.
(Total for Question 14 is 3 marks)
15
Larkspur Skincare currently sells 30% of its units direct online and 70% via retailers (question 6), earning £78,000 total profit (question 8). It is deciding whether to invest in marketing to shift more of its sales toward the more profitable direct channel (£12.00 profit per unit, question 4) and away from retailers (£6.00 profit per unit, question 5). Recommend whether Larkspur Skincare should shift more of its sales toward the direct channel. Justify your answer using the figures calculated in this pack.
(Total for Question 15 is 9 marks)
Mark scheme · 2.6 Place and distribution
Question 1
B1 A cao
Answer: A
Question 2
B1 a direct channel sells straight from the producer to the customer, with no intermediary
B1 an indirect channel uses one or more intermediaries (e.g. a wholesaler or retailer) between the producer and the customer
Answer: A direct channel sells straight from producer to customer with no intermediary; an indirect channel uses one or more intermediaries, such as a wholesaler or retailer.
Question 3
B1 wholesaler
B1 retailer
Answer: Wholesaler and retailer.
Question 4
M1 20.00 - 6.00 - 2.00 seen
A1 £12.00 cao
Answer: £12.00.
Question 5
M1 12.00 - 6.00 seen
A1 £6.00 cao
Answer: £6.00.
Question 6
(a) M1 (3,000 / 10,000) x 100 seen
(a) A1 30% cao
(a) Answer: 30%.
(b) M1 (7,000 / 10,000) x 100 seen
(b) A1 70% cao, with 30% + 70% = 100% confirmed
(b) Answer: 70%; 30% + 70% = 100%.
Question 7
M1 7,000 x 6.00 seen (ft from questions 7 and 8b)
A1 £42,000 cao
Answer: £42,000.
Question 8
M1 36,000 + 42,000 seen (ft from questions 9 and 10)
A1 £78,000 cao
Answer: £78,000.
Question 9
B1 identifies a risk, e.g. Larkspur Skincare becomes fully dependent on its own website working and being found by customers
B1 develops the consequence, e.g. a technical fault, delivery problem, or low online visibility could mean lost sales with no retailer channel to fall back on
Answer: Larkspur Skincare would become fully dependent on its own website working and being found by customers, so a technical fault or low online visibility could mean lost sales with no retailer channel to fall back on.
Question 10
B1 identifies an advantage, e.g. Larkspur Skincare keeps a larger share of the final selling price, since no intermediary takes a cut
B1 develops it, e.g. this means a higher profit margin per unit sold
B1 adds a further point, e.g. it also lets Larkspur Skincare control the full customer experience and collect direct customer data
Answer: Larkspur Skincare keeps a larger share of the final selling price since no intermediary takes a cut, giving a higher profit margin per unit, and it also lets Larkspur Skincare control the customer experience and collect direct customer data.
Question 11
B1 identifies an advantage, e.g. retailers already have an established customer base and store network
B1 develops it, e.g. so Larkspur Skincare can reach far more customers than its own website alone could
B1 links to the outcome, e.g. increasing total sales volume even though the profit per unit is lower
Answer: Retailers already have an established customer base and store network, so Larkspur Skincare can reach far more customers than its own website alone, increasing total sales volume even though profit per unit is lower.
Question 12
M1 3,000 x 12.00 seen (ft from questions 6 and 8a)
A1 £36,000 cao
Answer: £36,000.
Question 13
M1 10,000 x 12.00 = 120,000 seen
M1 120,000 - 78,000 seen (ft from question 11)
A1 £42,000 more profit cao
Answer: £120,000 if all sold direct; £42,000 more than the actual £78,000 total profit.
Question 14
B1 identifies that Larkspur Skincare cannot assume it could sell all 10,000 units direct
B1 explains why, e.g. many customers only buy skincare from a physical shop or trusted retailer, and reaching all of them directly would need far more marketing spend and brand awareness than Larkspur Skincare currently has
B1 links to the consequence, e.g. so sales volume, not just profit per unit, would likely fall sharply without retailers, reducing the actual profit achieved well below the £120,000 theoretical figure
Answer: The £120,000 figure assumes all 10,000 units could still be sold direct, but many customers only buy from a physical shop or trusted retailer, so reaching them directly would need far more marketing spend; without retailers, sales volume would likely fall sharply, reducing actual profit well below £120,000.
Question 15
Level 1 (1-3): Makes simple, undeveloped comments about the direct and retailer channels, with little or no use of the pack's figures and no clear recommendation.
Level 2 (4-6): Gives a developed argument for or against shifting toward the direct channel, using some of the pack's figures, but does not fully weigh both sides or reach a clearly justified recommendation.
Level 3 (7-9): Weighs the evidence for and against shifting toward the direct channel, using the profit-per-unit and total profit figures from this pack, and reaches a justified recommendation supported by that analysis.
Indicative content:
Direct sales earn double the profit per unit of retailer sales (£12.00 versus £6.00, questions 6 and 7), so even a modest shift from retailer to direct sales would raise total profit above the current £78,000.
The theoretical maximum of £120,000 if all units were sold direct (question 12) shows the scale of profit potentially available, an extra £42,000 over the current total.
However, question 13 showed this theoretical figure assumes unchanged sales volume, which is unrealistic: many customers currently buying via the 70% retailer channel may not switch to buying direct, so a large, sudden shift risks losing sales volume rather than just changing where profit comes from.
A moderate, gradual shift (for example investing in marketing to grow the direct share from 30% toward 40-50% over time) captures some of the higher direct margin while keeping the retailer channel's reach as a safety net.
Judgement: given the large profit-per-unit gap (£12.00 versus £6.00) but the real risk of losing sales volume if retailers are dropped too quickly (question 13), Larkspur Skincare should invest in marketing to grow the direct channel's share gradually rather than shifting all at once, reviewing sales volume at each stage to check that total profit is actually rising, not just profit per unit.