Answer ALL questions. For extended responses write full sentences. Spend about 70 minutes in total.
1
Define the role of a Crown Court judge during a trial for a serious indictable offence.
(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)
2
Explain two formal ways the police and courts share information during the process from arrest to sentence, naming the document or procedure used.
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
3
Describe one way court procedure aims to protect the rights of a defendant during the trial process, and explain why this matters for justice.
(Total for Question 3 is 3 marks)
4
Identify and explain one professional role, other than police officers, that supports the criminal justice process between arrest and sentencing.
(Total for Question 4 is 2 marks)
5
Discuss how effectively the police and the courts work together to deliver justice in England and Wales, focusing on institutional roles and procedure from arrest to sentence.
In your answer, consider at least two ways the institutions cooperate and at least two limits or tensions between them, and reach a supported judgement on overall effectiveness.
(Total for Question 5 is 8 marks)
6
Define what is meant by the police exercising 'discretion' when responding to reports of crime in a local community.
(Total for Question 6 is 2 marks)
7
Describe two formal powers the police have when conducting stop-and-search on a public street in England and Wales, naming the legal basis and one limit on each power.
(Total for Question 7 is 4 marks)
8
Identify and explain one role of police custody officers after a person has been arrested and brought to the station.
(Total for Question 8 is 4 marks)
9
Identify and explain one formal outcome the police may use instead of charging a suspect, after investigation of a minor offence.
(Total for Question 9 is 2 marks)
10
Identify and explain the role of a jury in the Crown Court when a defendant is tried for a serious offence.
(Total for Question 10 is 4 marks)
11
Explain two ways magistrates or a district judge in a Magistrates' Court contribute to the early stages of the criminal justice process, from arrest to sentence for less serious offences.
(Total for Question 11 is 4 marks)
Mark scheme · 5.12 The Role of the Police and Courts in the Criminal Justice System
Question 1
B1 identifies that the judge ensures the trial follows the law and procedure, and directs the jury on legal points
B1 development, e.g. after a guilty verdict the judge decides and passes the sentence
Answer: The Crown Court judge ensures the trial follows legal procedure and directs the jury on points of law; after a guilty verdict the judge decides and passes the sentence.
Question 2
B1 identifies one way, e.g. police prepare a case file or prosecution file for the Crown Prosecution Service or the court
B1 explains how it works, e.g. the file contains evidence, witness statements and charging decisions used by prosecutors and judges in court
Answer: One formal way is the police preparing a case or prosecution file containing evidence and witness statements which is passed to the CPS or the court to support charging and trial decisions.
Question 3
B1 identifies a procedural protection, e.g. the right to legal representation
B1 development, e.g. defendants can have a solicitor or barrister to present their case and question witnesses
B1 explains why it matters, e.g. it helps ensure a fair trial and that the defendant can challenge evidence against them
Answer: A protection is the right to legal representation, allowing a defendant a solicitor or barrister to present their case and challenge witnesses; this matters because it helps ensure a fair trial and the opportunity to contest the prosecution's evidence.
Question 4
B1 identifies a role, e.g. the Crown Prosecution Service prosecutor
B1 explains how it supports the process, e.g. the prosecutor decides whether to charge and presents the case in court on behalf of the state
Answer: The Crown Prosecution Service prosecutor supports the process by deciding whether to charge a suspect and by presenting and arguing the case in court on behalf of the state.
Question 5
Level 1 (1-2): Basic statements about cooperation or limits with little development or linkage to institutional roles and procedure
Level 2 (3-5): Clear explanation of some ways police and courts cooperate and some limits, with some use of procedural detail and an attempted judgement
Level 3 (6-8): Detailed, balanced discussion of multiple cooperating mechanisms and tensions, using specific institutional roles and procedures, and a well supported judgement on effectiveness
Indicative content:
Cooperation point: police prepare prosecution files and evidence that the Crown Prosecution Service and courts use to decide charges and run trials, showing procedural dependence
Cooperation point: police attendance at court to give evidence and explain investigative decisions helps the court reach informed verdicts and sentencing decisions
Cooperation point: pre-trial procedures such as disclosure of evidence and case management hearings coordinate police, prosecutors and judges to avoid surprises at trial
Limit or tension: resource and time pressures, such as police backlogs or court listing delays, can weaken the flow of timely evidence and cause adjournments
Limit or tension: legal and ethical standards, for example requirements on disclosure or the need to protect suspects rights, can create friction if police investigations do not meet prosecutorial expectations
Limit or tension: differences in priorities, for example police focus on investigation and community safety while courts focus on legal proof and fair trial, can lead to differing views on whether a case should proceed
Limit or tension: procedural errors or poor evidence handling by police can result in cases being dismissed or reduced sentences, limiting the courts ability to deliver justice
Judgement guidance: a balanced view might conclude the institutions largely work together through established procedures, but effectiveness is sometimes undermined by resource constraints, procedural failures or differing institutional aims
Question 6
B1 identifies that discretion means officers make a judgement call about whether and how to act in a specific situation rather than acting automatically, oe
B1 development, e.g. choosing to issue a warning, take no further action or proceed to arrest depending on circumstances
Answer: Discretion means officers make a judgement call about whether and how to act in a situation rather than acting automatically; for example they may warn, take no further action or arrest depending on circumstances.
Question 7
B1 first power named, e.g. power to stop and search under PACE (Police and Criminal Evidence Act) or other statutory power
B1 development, e.g. limit: officer must have reasonable grounds for suspicion before using this power
B1 second power named, e.g. power to search for offensive weapons or drugs under specific statutory provisions
B1 development, e.g. limit: searches must be recorded and the person offered a written receipt, restricting unchecked use
Answer: Power to stop and search under PACE or specific statutory powers, which requires reasonable grounds for suspicion; and power to search for offensive weapons or drugs under other statutes, which must be recorded and a receipt offered, limiting unchecked use.
Question 8
B1 identifies a role, e.g. ensure the detainee's rights and welfare while in custody
B1 explains how this operates, e.g. checking detainee is safe, providing access to legal advice and recording any medical needs
B1 identifies a second role, e.g. to take and record statements and other evidence from the detainee
B1 explains how this operates, e.g. arranging interviews in accordance with codes of practice and ensuring correct custody records
Answer: Custody officers ensure the detainee's rights and welfare in custody, for example checking safety, providing access to legal advice and recording medical needs; they also arrange and record interviews and statements in line with codes of practice and keep custody records.
Question 9
B1 identifies a formal outcome, e.g. issuing a caution or a conditional caution
B1 explains how it operates, e.g. a caution records the offence but avoids court, often used for first-time or low-level offending
Answer: A formal outcome is issuing a caution or conditional caution, which records the offence but avoids court proceedings and is often used for first-time or low-level offending.
Question 10
B1 identifies the role, e.g. juries decide questions of fact, including guilt or innocence
B1 explains how this operates, e.g. jurors listen to evidence and apply the law as directed by the judge to reach a verdict, usually by majority
B1 identifies a further point, e.g. juries do not decide sentences except in specific rare cases
B1 explains the limit, e.g. sentencing is the responsibility of the judge after a guilty verdict
Answer: Juries decide questions of fact, including guilt or innocence, by listening to evidence and applying the law as directed by the judge, usually reaching a verdict by majority; they do not decide sentences, which are imposed by the judge after conviction.
Question 11
B1 identifies that magistrates deal with initial hearings such as bail decisions and preliminary matters
B1 explains how this affects process, e.g. they decide whether a defendant is remanded in custody or granted bail pending trial
B1 identifies that magistrates can hear and sentence summary offences and impose community sentences or fines
B1 explains the impact, e.g. their sentencing powers provide a quicker resolution for less serious cases without sending them to Crown Court
Answer: Magistrates deal with initial hearings, such as bail decisions and preliminary matters, deciding whether a defendant is remanded or granted bail; they also hear and sentence summary offences, imposing fines or community sentences to resolve less serious cases quickly without referral to Crown Court.