Revision Library

revisionlibrary.co.uk

GCSE · English Literature

GE.T-BloodBrothers Literature: Blood Brothers (Willy Russell)

AQA 8702 · Calculators not allowed · about 150 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions. Show all your working.

List four facts we learn about Mrs Johnstone's circumstances before she agrees to let Mrs Lyons bring up one of her twins.

(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)

Identify two separate moments early in the play where a superstition or omen is introduced, and briefly explain what each one warns.

(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)

Explain how Russell presents Mrs Johnstone's character in the earlier part of the play.

(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)

Explain how Russell presents Mrs Lyons as an increasingly anxious character as the play goes on.

(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)

Explain how the social and economic conditions of the period help to explain what happens to Mickey after he leaves school.

(Total for Question 5 is 8 marks)

Explain how Russell presents the friendship between Mickey and Edward when they first meet as children.

(Total for Question 6 is 8 marks)

Analyse how Russell uses the Narrator to build tension and a sense of fate across the play.

(Total for Question 7 is 8 marks)

Analyse how Russell presents the differences between Mickey's and Edward's lives as they grow older.

(Total for Question 8 is 10 marks)

Analyse how Russell presents Linda's role in the story of the twins.

(Total for Question 9 is 10 marks)

Write about how Russell uses dramatic methods such as song, direct address and doubling, rather than pure realism, to tell the twins' story.

(Total for Question 10 is 12 marks)

Write about how Russell uses dramatic irony across the play, since the audience knows from early on that Mickey and Edward are twins.

(Total for Question 11 is 12 marks)

Write about how Russell presents ideas about class in the play, and comment on why this message would have felt especially relevant to audiences watching in the early 1980s.

(Total for Question 12 is 15 marks)

Write about how Russell presents the theme of fate versus upbringing across the play, and comment on how the play's structure keeps this question open rather than settling it.

(Total for Question 13 is 15 marks)

Write about the dramatic significance of the play's final scene, and comment on why its ending would have felt shocking to a first audience.

(Total for Question 14 is 15 marks)

'In Blood Brothers, Russell suggests that upbringing, not blood, decides who we become.'

Using this statement as a starting point, write about how far you agree, referring to the play as a whole.

(Total for Question 15 is 20 marks)

Starting with the moment Mickey and Edward first meet as boys and agree to become blood brothers, write about how Russell presents ideas about fate, class and family across the play as a whole, and evaluate how far a modern audience might respond differently to the play's central message than an audience watching in the early 1980s.

In your response you should discuss:
- how Russell presents fate, class and family in this moment and across the play
- the dramatic methods Russell uses to build his argument
- how far a modern audience's response might differ from an early-1980s audience's response

(Total for Question 16 is 30 marks)

Mark scheme · GE.T-BloodBrothers Literature: Blood Brothers (Willy Russell)

Question 1

B1 she already has several other children to support (oe)
B1 her husband has recently left the family
B1 she is in debt/behind on payments and worried about how she will manage financially
B1 any other valid fact, e.g. she cleans Mrs Lyons' house for money / she has just learned she is expecting twins / she fears she cannot afford to keep all her children
Answer: Any four of: she already has several children; her husband has left the family; she is in debt and struggling financially; she works cleaning Mrs Lyons' house; she has just discovered she is expecting twins, which she fears she cannot afford to keep.

Question 2

B1 identifies Mrs Lyons' invented superstition about the separated twins
B1 explains its warning (if the twins ever learn they were once a pair, both shall immediately die, oe)
B1 identifies a second superstition/omen, e.g. new shoes placed on a table
B1 explains its warning (that it is a sign of bad luck to come, oe)
Answer: Moment one: Mrs Lyons tells Mrs Johnstone that if the twins ever discover they were separated at birth, both will die. Moment two: Mrs Johnstone reacts with alarm to new shoes being placed on a table, treating it as a sign of bad luck.

Question 3

Level 3 (5-6): Clear, relevant explanation: identifies specific details of Mrs Johnstone's early presentation (her warmth towards her children, her superstitious nature, her pride despite poverty) and explains a clear effect, supported by reference to the text.
Level 2 (3-4): Some explanation: identifies a relevant detail about Mrs Johnstone's early character with a generally appropriate comment, with some reference to the text.
Level 1 (1-2): Simple, limited explanation: makes a simple or general comment about Mrs Johnstone with little development or textual reference.
Indicative content:
- Mrs Johnstone is presented as a warm, devoted mother who clearly loves her children despite having very little money to care for them
- her strong superstitious streak, shown through her reaction to everyday omens, presents her as someone who feels she has little control over her own fate
- her pride, shown in small details such as keeping herself and her home as presentable as she can manage, suggests a woman trying to maintain dignity in difficult circumstances
- her willingness to agree to Mrs Lyons' plan, despite clear unease, shows the audience how financial desperation can override a mother's instincts, inviting sympathy rather than judgement

Question 4

Level 3 (5-6): Clear, relevant explanation: analyses how Mrs Lyons' behaviour becomes more controlling and paranoid as the play progresses, with clear reference to the text.
Level 2 (3-4): Some explanation: identifies a relevant change in Mrs Lyons with a generally appropriate comment, with some textual reference.
Level 1 (1-2): Simple, limited explanation: makes a simple or general comment on Mrs Lyons with little development.
Indicative content:
- Mrs Lyons is first presented as outwardly comfortable and persuasive, able to talk Mrs Johnstone into the agreement at her most vulnerable moment
- as the play progresses she becomes increasingly obsessive about keeping Mickey and Edward apart, going as far as moving the family away from the area
- her mounting fear that the truth will emerge, or that the superstition she herself invented will come true, presents her as trapped by her own deception
- her growing instability isolates her from her husband and makes her seem, by the play's later stages, one of the more troubling and pitiable figures rather than simply a villain

Question 5

Level 4 (7-8): Clear, well-supported explanation: analyses how Mickey's redundancy and lack of prospects reflect the wider economic conditions of the period, with well-chosen textual reference and clear understanding of context.
Level 3 (5-6): Clear explanation: explains how context relates to Mickey's situation, with relevant textual reference and some understanding of context.
Level 2 (3-4): Some explanation: identifies a relevant point about Mickey's circumstances with some textual reference.
Level 1 (1-2): Simple, limited explanation: makes a simple or general comment on Mickey's situation with little development.
Indicative content:
- Mickey leaves school into a job market with high youth unemployment, unlike Edward, who is able to go on to university
- his inability to find work is presented as a social problem caused by wider economic decline, not simply a personal failing
- financial pressure and boredom contribute to his involvement in his brother Sammy's crime, which eventually leads to a prison sentence
- this reflects real conditions in Britain in the period the play covers, when industrial decline and rising unemployment hit working-class communities like Mickey's especially hard
- Russell uses Mickey's story to argue that circumstance and opportunity, not personal nature, decide how a life turns out

Question 6

Level 4 (7-8): Clear, well-supported explanation: analyses how the boys' instant, easy connection despite their different backgrounds supports a nurture-over-nature reading, with well-chosen textual reference.
Level 3 (5-6): Clear explanation: explains the boys' early friendship with relevant textual reference.
Level 2 (3-4): Some explanation: identifies a relevant point about the friendship with some textual reference.
Level 1 (1-2): Simple, limited explanation: makes a simple or general comment with little development.
Indicative content:
- the boys form an instant, easy connection despite having been raised in completely different homes, suggesting shared nature rather than upbringing initially draws them together
- their childhood pact to become blood brothers is deeply poignant for the audience, who already know the boys are literally brothers by blood
- small early differences in the boys' confidence, vocabulary and behaviour hint at how their different upbringings are already shaping them, even within an otherwise equal friendship
- the friendship's innocence and warmth at this stage makes the later, class-driven separation of the two boys feel more clearly unjust and avoidable to the audience

Question 7

Level 4 (7-8): Convincing, well-supported analysis: analyses more than one method used by the Narrator (direct address, repeated warnings, movement through time) and their combined effect, with precise reference and subject terminology.
Level 3 (5-6): Clear analysis: explains how at least one significant Narrator technique builds tension or fate, with relevant reference.
Level 2 (3-4): Some analysis: identifies a relevant Narrator technique with a generally appropriate comment.
Level 1 (1-2): Simple, limited analysis: makes a simple or general comment on the Narrator with little development.
Indicative content:
- the Narrator steps outside individual scenes to address the audience directly, repeatedly reminding them of the debt hanging over the family and the danger the superstition represents
- his ability to move quickly between different points in time keeps the audience aware that events are heading towards a fixed, foreshadowed outcome rather than an open one
- his warnings recur at moments when the twins nearly discover the truth, sharpening tension each time without resolving it
- his detached, almost fatalistic tone can be read as the voice of superstition or fate itself rather than a neutral storyteller, blurring the line between narration and prophecy

Question 8

Level 4 (9-10): Convincing, well-structured analysis: tracks the widening gap between Mickey's and Edward's lives from school through adulthood, with judicious textual reference and confident subject terminology.
Level 3 (6-8): Clear analysis: explains at least two contrasts between the twins' lives with relevant textual reference.
Level 2 (3-5): Some analysis: identifies a relevant contrast with some textual reference.
Level 1 (1-2): Simple, limited analysis: makes a simple, undeveloped point with little textual reference.
Indicative content:
- differences in schooling and expectation are established early, with Edward's education preparing him for university while Mickey's prepares him for little beyond leaving school to find work
- when the boys get into the same mischief as children, Edward's background allows him to avoid serious consequences in a way Mickey cannot, exposing an early double standard
- as adults, Edward moves into a respected, comfortable career while Mickey struggles with unemployment, showing how the twins' identical nature leads to completely different outcomes
- by the play's later stages, the gap has widened into a stark contrast between Edward's continued success and Mickey's depression and dependency on medication, which Russell uses to argue that circumstance, not nature, decided their fates

Question 9

Level 4 (9-10): Convincing, well-structured analysis: tracks Linda's function across the play from childhood friend to catalyst for the final crisis, with judicious textual reference and confident terminology.
Level 3 (6-8): Clear analysis: explains at least two aspects of Linda's role with relevant textual reference.
Level 2 (3-5): Some analysis: identifies a relevant point about Linda with some textual reference.
Level 1 (1-2): Simple, limited analysis: makes a simple, undeveloped point with little textual reference.
Indicative content:
- Linda grows up on the estate as Mickey's friend and, later, his wife, giving the audience a character whose affection crosses the class divide the rest of the play insists on, since she is also cared for by Edward
- her adult life, marked by a struggling marriage and financial hardship, mirrors Mrs Johnstone's own experience, suggesting that class and circumstance, not personality, shape a woman's options
- as Mickey's depression deepens, Linda's turn towards Edward for support drives much of the play's final tension, making her a catalyst rather than a passive figure
- Russell uses Linda's position, loved by and connected to both twins, to keep the audience aware of what the class divide has cost all three characters, not just the twins themselves

Question 10

Level 4 (10-12): Convincing, well-structured response: sustained analysis of several non-naturalistic methods and their combined effect across the whole play, with judicious reference and confident subject terminology.
Level 3 (7-9): Clear response: explains at least two dramatic methods and their effect, with relevant reference.
Level 2 (4-6): Some response: identifies a relevant dramatic method with some supporting reference.
Level 1 (1-3): Simple, limited response: makes a simple, undeveloped point about staging or method with little or no reference.
Indicative content:
- songs are used to summarise time passing or to comment on events, rather than simply advancing the plot in a naturalistic way
- the Narrator's direct address to the audience repeatedly breaks the illusion of realism, inviting the audience to judge the situation rather than simply become emotionally absorbed in it
- the doubling of the twins' childhood scenes, showing Mickey and Edward behaving almost identically despite their different homes, draws attention to nurture rather than nature as the deciding factor
- these non-naturalistic devices work alongside more naturalistic domestic dialogue scenes, so the audience is kept aware of the play's wider social message even during its most intimate, personal moments

Question 11

Level 4 (10-12): Convincing, well-structured response: sustained analysis of dramatic irony across several moments in the play, with judicious reference and confident subject terminology.
Level 3 (7-9): Clear response: explains dramatic irony at more than one moment, with relevant reference.
Level 2 (4-6): Some response: identifies a relevant moment of dramatic irony with some supporting reference.
Level 1 (1-3): Simple, limited response: makes a simple, undeveloped point with little or no reference.
Indicative content:
- the boys' childhood pact to become blood brothers is especially poignant because the audience knows it is literally true, while the characters do not
- moments when the two mothers meet unexpectedly create suspense, since the audience fears the superstition might be triggered even though the characters on stage are unaware of the danger
- as the twins grow apart because of class, the irony sharpens the audience's sense of injustice, since they know the boys are equals by blood even as society treats them as unequal
- this sustained gap between what the audience knows and what the characters know builds steadily towards the final scene, where the truth is revealed to the characters at the same moment as the play's tragic climax

Question 12

Level 4 (12-15): Convincing, critical response: sustained, perceptive analysis of class across several characters and methods, with judicious reference and confident terminology; contextual point about the early 1980s integrated fully.
Level 3 (8-11): Clear, relevant response: explains how class is presented through at least two characters/methods, with relevant reference and a clear contextual point.
Level 2 (4-7): Some, generic response: identifies relevant moments relating to class with some reference; makes a generic or partly relevant contextual comment.
Level 1 (1-3): Simple, limited response: makes a simple, undeveloped point with little or no reference; little or no contextual comment.
Indicative content:
- the contrast between the Johnstone and Lyons households, in housing, opportunity and expectation, presents class as the main force shaping the twins' different fates despite their identical nature
- Mickey's redundancy and Edward's continued success dramatise the unequal opportunities available to working-class and middle-class school leavers
- the superstition and fate motif runs alongside the class argument, offering the audience two possible explanations for the tragedy without ever fully separating them
- context: the play is set across a period of rising unemployment and industrial decline in Britain, and was first staged in the early 1980s, a time of high unemployment and sharp political debate about inequality
- audiences at that time were likely to recognise Mickey's situation as reflecting real, contemporary economic hardship rather than a purely fictional misfortune, giving the play's message immediate political relevance

Question 13

Level 4 (12-15): Convincing, critical response: sustained, perceptive analysis of fate versus upbringing across the whole play, with judicious reference and confident terminology; contextual point integrated fully.
Level 3 (8-11): Clear, relevant response: explains the tension between fate and upbringing through at least two moments/methods, with relevant reference and a clear contextual point.
Level 2 (4-7): Some, generic response: identifies relevant moments relating to fate or upbringing with some reference; makes a generic or partly relevant contextual comment.
Level 1 (1-3): Simple, limited response: makes a simple, undeveloped point with little or no reference; little or no contextual comment.
Indicative content:
- the twins' near-identical instincts and behaviour as young boys suggest a shared nature, before their different environments visibly begin to shape them apart
- the invented superstition offers the audience a supernatural explanation for the tragedy that the play never straightforwardly confirms or denies
- the final scene fulfils the superstition literally, since both twins die once the truth is revealed, while also being caused by entirely explicable social and emotional pressures, including unemployment, jealousy and grief
- Russell sustains this ambiguity rather than resolving it, deliberately leaving the audience to weigh a social explanation for the tragedy against a fatalistic one
- context: the play's closing question about whether we are shaped by fate or by the conditions we are born into reflects wider debates about inequality current when the play was first performed

Question 14

Level 4 (12-15): Convincing, critical response: sustained, perceptive analysis of the final scene's dramatic significance, with judicious reference and confident terminology; contextual point about a first audience's reaction integrated fully.
Level 3 (8-11): Clear, relevant response: explains the significance of the final scene through at least two methods, with relevant reference and a clear contextual point.
Level 2 (4-7): Some, generic response: identifies relevant features of the ending with some reference; makes a generic or partly relevant contextual comment.
Level 1 (1-3): Simple, limited response: makes a simple, undeveloped point with little or no reference; little or no contextual comment.
Indicative content:
- the final scene brings together the superstition and the class divide simultaneously, as Mrs Johnstone's revelation of the truth arrives at the worst possible moment rather than in time to prevent tragedy
- the presence of a gun, obtained earlier through Mickey's involvement in crime, links his social decline directly to the play's violent climax
- the deaths of both twins fulfil the superstition literally, while also reading as the consequence of untreated depression, jealousy and long-building inequality between the brothers
- the shock for a first audience comes partly from the sudden double death of two previously sympathetic young characters, and partly from the Narrator's closing questions, which refuse to comfortably resolve whether fate or society caused the tragedy
- context: staged in the early 1980s, the ending's suggestion that ordinary social conditions can lead to violent tragedy would have resonated with contemporary anxieties about unemployment and inequality

Question 15

Level 4 (16-20): Compelling, critical response: sustained, sophisticated engagement with the statement across the whole play; judicious, precisely selected reference; perceptive analysis of language, form and structure with consistently precise subject terminology; contextual understanding woven fully into the argument.
Level 3 (11-15): Clear, well-structured response: sustained, clear engagement with the statement; well-chosen reference; explains effects of methods and structure with accurate subject terminology; relevant context clearly shown.
Level 2 (6-10): Some, generic response: attempts to engage with the statement with some relevant reference; comments on methods/structure with limited subject terminology; some awareness of context.
Level 1 (1-5): Simple, limited response: simple or narrative response with limited textual reference; simple or no comment on methods/structure; little or no awareness of context.
Indicative content:
- agree: the twins share identical nature yet end up with completely different outcomes, strongly suggesting their contrasting upbringings, not their blood, decide who they become
- agree: class-coded differences in speech, confidence and opportunity, visible from childhood onward, are presented as environmental rather than inherited
- agree: Mickey's unemployment and depression are shown to result directly from his social circumstances rather than any personal or inherited flaw
- qualify/disagree: the invented superstition, and its literal fulfilment at the play's end, suggests something more fatalistic at work than pure social conditioning
- qualify/disagree: the boys' near-identical instincts and easy connection as young children could support a reading that some shared nature exists before nurture visibly takes over
- context: the play's first audiences, watching amid real unemployment and inequality in the early 1980s, would likely have received its argument about upbringing as directly relevant to their own society, strengthening a 'nurture' reading of the statement

Question 16

Level 4 (25-30): Compelling, critical evaluation: sustained, sophisticated evaluation of fate, class and family across the whole play; judicious, precisely selected references; perceptive analysis of language, form and structure with consistently precise subject terminology; contextual understanding of early-1980s versus modern reception woven seamlessly into the argument.
Level 3 (17-24): Critical, exploratory evaluation: exploratory, critical response with a clear line of argument sustained across the play; judicious range of references; analyses effects of language, form and structure with precise subject terminology; contextual factors integrated fully where relevant.
Level 2 (9-16): Detailed, well-structured evaluation: consistently clear, detailed evaluation of fate, class and family; well-chosen range of references; explains effects of methods and structure with subject terminology used accurately; understanding of relevant context clearly shown.
Level 1 (1-8): Simple or clear evaluation: simple or clear response with some relevant reference; some comment on methods/structure with limited or accurate use of subject terminology; some or little awareness of context.
Indicative content:
- the boys' instant, innocent friendship and blood-brother pact, formed in ignorance of their true relationship, sets up a direct tension between the family bond they already share and the class divide about to separate them
- the invented superstition, hanging over this friendship from the start, frames the rest of the play as heading towards a fixed, foreshadowed outcome, building sustained dramatic irony as the boys grow up unaware
- the widening gap between the twins' opportunities, culminating in Edward's success and Mickey's unemployment, depression and eventual crime, dramatises class as at least as powerful a force as fate in shaping their lives
- methods: the Narrator's recurring direct address, the use of song to comment on events, and the doubling of the twins' early behaviour work together to keep the audience judging the social argument even during the play's most emotionally naturalistic scenes
- the final scene fuses the superstition and the class argument into a single tragedy, refusing to let the audience settle on one explanation alone
- evaluation: an early-1980s audience, living through real mass unemployment and sharp political debate about inequality, was likely to receive the play's warning about class and circumstance as urgent and immediately relevant
- evaluation: a modern audience, more distanced from those specific historical conditions, may respond more to the play's treatment of mental health and depression in Mickey's decline, or read the story through current debates about social mobility and inequality, rather than experiencing the same immediate political urgency
- evaluation, counter-view: despite this distance, ongoing modern concerns about inequality, unemployment and family loyalty arguably keep the play's central warning widely resonant for contemporary audiences, even if the specific historical trigger has changed

Literature: Blood Brothers (Willy Russell) - Worksheets, Questions and Revision