20 original exam-style questions - 7 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.
Original narrative account written for Revision Library, grounded in the real history of John Harrison's marine chronometers and the eighteenth-century search for a solution to the longitude problem, including the 1707 Isles of Scilly disaster and the 1714 Longitude Act; no historical document or past-paper text reproduced verbatim.
[1] On a stormy night in October 1707, a fleet of Royal Navy ships returning from Gibraltar strayed hopelessly off course in the darkness and ran aground on the rocks of the Isles of Scilly. Four ships were wrecked within minutes of one another, and an estimated two thousand sailors drowned, in what remains one of the worst disasters in British naval history. The tragedy was not caused by an enemy fleet, nor by a sudden and unexpected storm, but by something far more ordinary: nobody aboard could say, with any real confidence, exactly where the ships were.
[2] Sailors of the time could measure latitude, their position north or south, reasonably well by observing the height of the sun or the Pole Star above the horizon. Longitude, their position east or west, was a far trickier puzzle. In theory, it could be worked out by comparing local time, calculated from the sun's position, with the time at a fixed reference point such as London; every hour of difference represented fifteen degrees of longitude. In practice, this required a clock that could keep accurate London time for months at sea, and no clock built in the early eighteenth century could survive a rolling ship, salty air and swings in temperature without losing minutes, sometimes hours, along the way. Shocked by the scale of the Scilly disaster, Parliament passed the Longitude Act in 1714, offering a reward of up to twenty thousand pounds, an almost unimaginable fortune, to anyone who could solve the problem, to be judged by a newly formed panel called the Board of Longitude.
[3] Among those who read of the prize was John Harrison, a carpenter from a small Lincolnshire village who had never received a single day of formal training in clockmaking. As a young man he had built precision clocks almost as a private hobby, carving many of the moving parts from a dense, oily wood called lignum vitae so that they needed no lubricating oil, which tended to thicken or evaporate over time and threw the timekeeping out. Most of the country's leading scientists were convinced that the answer to the longitude problem lay in astronomy, in painstaking measurements of the moon's position against the stars, not in a mechanical box of cogs and springs. Harrison disagreed, and in 1730 he travelled to London, his sea clock designs in hand, determined to prove that a machine could succeed where the astronomers' calculations could not.
[4] What followed was not a single triumphant invention but more than twenty years of relentless refinement. Harrison's first sea clock, known simply as H1, was finished in 1735 and performed promisingly on a trial voyage to Lisbon, yet Harrison himself was dissatisfied with it and immediately began again. H2 followed, then H3, each one heavier, more complicated and, in Harrison's own exacting judgement, still not quite good enough. Nearly a quarter of a century passed between the completion of H1 and H3, years spent testing, dismantling and rebuilding almost every part of the mechanism in a workshop that, by the late 1750s, still smelled faintly of the same lignum vitae shavings that had filled it decades before.
[5] The breakthrough was tiny. Harrison's real leap forward came not from making his sea clock larger and sturdier, as his earlier designs had assumed was necessary, but from making it dramatically smaller. Completed in 1759, H4 was little bigger than a large pocket watch, a complete departure from the bulky machines that had come before. In 1761, Harrison's son William carried it aboard a ship bound for Jamaica to put it to the ultimate test. After eighty-one days at sea, crossing an ocean in every kind of weather, H4 had lost a mere five seconds, an astonishing degree of accuracy that ought to have settled the matter at once. Yet the Board of Longitude, dominated by astronomers who had staked their careers on the rival lunar-distance method, seemed reluctant to believe that a self-taught carpenter's watch had beaten them, and Harrison found himself demanding a second trial, then a third, simply to be taken seriously.
[6] It took the direct intervention of King George III, who reportedly tested a replica of H4 himself and pronounced Harrison badly treated, before Parliament finally voted him a further payment in 1773, some forty-three years after his first journey to London with H1 under his arm. Harrison died just three years later, in 1776, having transformed a carpenter's hobby into an instrument that would guide ships safely across every ocean on earth. Every marine chronometer built in the centuries since owes something to his stubborn insistence that a machine, however small, could out-perform the stars. It is a story less about a single clever invention than about a man who refused, for over forty years, to accept that good enough was actually good enough.