GCSE History · Topic guide

Detente and Arms Control: SALT I and the Helsinki Agreement, 1969-75

Detente in the 1970s produced the Cold War's first serious arms control agreements, as both superpowers sought a more stable relationship after the dangers of the Cuban Missile Crisis and the costs of the ongoing arms race. SALT I (the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks) was signed by President Nixon and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev in Moscow in May 1972, and consisted of two parts: the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, which limited each side's missile defence systems, and an Interim Agreement, which froze the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) each side could hold for five years. The Helsinki Accords, signed in August 1975 by 35 states including the USA and the USSR, went further than arms control, formally recognising the existing borders of post-war Europe and committing all signatories to respect human rights and basic freedoms, though the USSR's actual record on human rights changed very little in practice.

Grades 4-7 (GCSE)Superpower Relations and the Cold War, 1941-91AQAWJECEduqas

Method

  1. Learn SALT I as two separate agreements signed together, not one: the ABM Treaty limited each side to a small number of missile defence sites, and the Interim Agreement froze (rather than reduced) the number of ICBMs each side held for five years, so SALT I slowed the arms race without reversing it.
  2. Learn who signed SALT I and where, since exam questions reward this precision: President Nixon and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, in Moscow, in May 1972.
  3. Learn the Helsinki Accords as a wider agreement than SALT I: signed in August 1975 by 35 states, it recognised the existing borders in Europe established after the Second World War, and included a commitment to human rights and basic freedoms, often called the 'third basket' of the agreement.
  4. Learn the gap between promise and practice at Helsinki: although the USSR signed the human rights commitment, it continued to restrict free speech, censor the press and imprison dissidents, so Helsinki is best explained as a symbolic step that gave Western governments and human rights campaigners a document to hold the USSR to, rather than a change that was immediately enforced.
  5. For 'explain two consequences of...' questions, keep the practical consequence (slower growth in nuclear weapons numbers under SALT I) separate from the political/symbolic consequence (recognition of European borders, or a moral argument Western campaigners could use against Soviet human rights abuses under Helsinki).
  6. For 'explain two of the following: importance' questions, be ready to argue that SALT I and Helsinki were important more for building trust and habits of negotiation between the superpowers than for their immediate practical effects, since neither agreement stopped the arms race outright.

Worked example

Explain two consequences of the Helsinki Accords of 1975 for relations between the superpowers.

  1. Identify two different consequences: one about European borders, and one about human rights.
  2. Write consequence one: by recognising the existing borders of post-war Europe, the Accords reduced one source of long-running tension, since Western states formally accepted the USSR's territorial gains in Eastern Europe, which the USSR had long wanted acknowledged.
  3. Support consequence one with detail: this removed a potential trigger for future disputes over borders, contributing to a period of more stable, predictable relations during the mid-1970s.
  4. Write consequence two: the human rights commitment gave Western governments and campaign groups a formal document to point to when criticising Soviet treatment of dissidents, even though the USSR's actual practices changed very little.
  5. Support consequence two with detail: human rights monitoring groups formed in the USSR and Eastern Bloc states after 1975, using the Helsinki commitments to draw international attention to abuses, which added a new source of pressure on Soviet governments in the years that followed.

Practice questions

Try each question, then tap to reveal the answer.

Q1Who signed SALT I, and where and when was it signed?Show answer

Answer: President Nixon and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, in Moscow, in May 1972.

Got it right?
Q2What did the ABM Treaty, part of SALT I, limit?Show answer

Answer: The number and type of anti-ballistic missile defence systems each side could deploy.

Got it right?
Q3What did the Interim Agreement, the other part of SALT I, do to the number of ICBMs each side held?Show answer

Answer: It froze (kept at existing levels) the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles each side could hold, for five years.

Got it right?
Q4When was the Helsinki Accords signed, and how many states signed it?Show answer

Answer: August 1975; 35 states.

Got it right?
Q5What did the Helsinki Accords formally recognise about Europe?Show answer

Answer: The existing, post-war borders of European states.

Got it right?
Q6What commitment did the Helsinki Accords include beyond borders and security?Show answer

Answer: A commitment by all signatories to respect human rights and basic freedoms.

Got it right?
Q7Did the USSR's actual treatment of dissidents change significantly after signing the Helsinki human rights commitment? Explain your answer briefly.Show answer

Answer: No - the USSR continued to censor the press and imprison dissidents, so the practical effect on Soviet behaviour was limited, even though the commitment gave campaigners a document to point to.

Got it right?

Exam-style questions

Written in the style of a GCSE History exam paper, with a full mark scheme.

Q1[8 marks]

Explain two consequences of SALT I for the arms race between the superpowers.

Show mark scheme

Tick each line you got. Your score builds from the marks on the scheme.

Nothing ticked yet - 8 available

Got it right?
Q2[16 marks]

Explain two of the following: (a) The importance of SALT I for relations between the superpowers. (b) The importance of the Helsinki Accords for human rights campaigners in the Eastern Bloc. (c) The importance of detente for the arms race of the 1970s. You must answer on two options.

Show mark scheme

Tick each line you got. Your score builds from the marks on the scheme.

Nothing ticked yet - 16 available

Got it right?

See real GCSE History past-paper questions, with official mark schemes

Free printable worksheet

Want more practice on paper? Download the detente and arms control: salt i and the helsinki agreement, 1969-75 worksheet pack - 8 pages of exam-style questions with a full mark scheme. One email opens every download in this browser for 14 days - no account, no card. Print it for personal and classroom use.

Next topics

Ready to practise detente and arms control: salt i and the helsinki agreement, 1969-75? Add it to a printable topic pack for this student in the Pack Builder.

Add to my pack

Not quite what you needed?

Tell us what is missing on detente and arms control: salt i and the helsinki agreement, 1969-75, or which topic to write up next. Every request is read, and we reply to every one.

Build a full practice pack.

This topic is one of hundreds in the library - pick the ones a student needs and generate a printable PDF in minutes.