Health: Concepts of Health, Illness and the Medicalisation of Society - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

12 original exam-style questions - 2 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.

Download PDF Jump to mark scheme (page 3)Health: Concepts of Health, Illness and the Medicalisation of Society revision guide

This topic is chapter 13 of A Level Sociology: Beliefs in society, global development and more Practice Book.

GSOC.AL37 Health: Concepts of Health, Illness and the Medicalisation of Society

AQA 7192 · about 60 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions. The two final longer questions must be answered in full sentences. Use sociological terms and, where asked, examples.

Identify and explain one example of Illich's iatrogenesis or Zola's claim about the expansion of medical jurisdiction in everyday life.

(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)

Describe Zola's idea about factors that contributed to the expansion of medical jurisdiction over everyday life in modern societies.

(Total for Question 2 is 3 marks)

Define the concept of 'stigma' as Erving Goffman used it when analysing illness and the body in social life.

(Total for Question 3 is 2 marks)

Describe one reason for the growth of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in contemporary societies.

(Total for Question 4 is 3 marks)

Identify and explain two differences between the biomedical model and the social model of health when applied to a local health problem such as rising asthma rates.

(Total for Question 5 is 4 marks)

Discuss how far sociologists would agree that medicalisation is mostly a negative development for individuals and society.

Using sociological perspectives and evidence, evaluate the claim that medicalisation is mostly negative. You should consider at least two differing sociological perspectives and reach a supported conclusion.

(Total for Question 6 is 12 marks)

Define the sociological term 'medicalisation' as used when studying health and illness in society.

(Total for Question 7 is 2 marks)

Describe one way the social model of health differs from the biomedical model when explaining the causes of illness in a UK community.

(Total for Question 8 is 3 marks)

Identify and explain two consequences of labelling illness as 'mental disorder' for a person in a local town context.

(Total for Question 9 is 4 marks)

Item A: A local GP records that a patient, Mr Khan, repeatedly reports insomnia and stress after job loss. The GP labels this as 'depression' and prescribes an antidepressant. The patient later feels that the label makes him appear weak to family and misses work because of side effects.

Using Item A and your own knowledge, explain one way labelling can affect a person's experience of illness.

(Total for Question 10 is 4 marks)

Identify and explain one criticism sociologists make of Parsons' sick role when applied to chronic illness in a UK context.

(Total for Question 11 is 4 marks)

Define 'iatrogenesis' as Ivan Illich used the term when discussing medicalisation and healthcare.

(Total for Question 12 is 2 marks)

Mark scheme · GSOC.AL37 Health: Concepts of Health, Illness and the Medicalisation of Society

Question 1

B1 identifies a correct example, e.g. normal life events becoming medical problems like childbirth or grief
B1 explains how this fits Zola's expansion of medical jurisdiction, e.g. medical professionals redefine these as requiring medical management
B1 identifies how this could be iatrogenic, e.g. intervention in childbirth can lead to unnecessary surgical procedures
B1 explains the iatrogenic effect, e.g. unnecessary procedures increase risk and create new medical dependence
Answer: One example is childbirth or grief being redefined as medical problems: Zola argued such redefinition expands medical jurisdiction into normal life, and Illich would note that intervention in childbirth can lead to unnecessary surgical procedures, creating physical risk and greater medical dependence.

Question 2

B1 identifies a factor, e.g. growing public faith in doctors and medicine
B1 development, e.g. people seek medical explanations for problems once seen as normal
B1 additional factor or development, e.g. medical record keeping and new technologies make medical definitions more powerful
Answer: Zola argued factors such as growing public faith in doctors, people seeking medical explanations for problems once seen as normal, and medical technologies and record keeping made medical definitions more powerful and expanded medical jurisdiction.

Question 3

B1 identifies stigma as a social attribute that spoils a person's identity or reduces their social acceptance
B1 development, e.g. Goffman linked stigma to visible or invisible differences that lead to discrimination or shame
Answer: Stigma is a social attribute that spoils a person's identity or reduces their social acceptance; Goffman linked it to visible or invisible differences that lead to discrimination, shame or altered social interactions.

Question 4

B1 identifies a reason, e.g. dissatisfaction with conventional medicine or side effects of treatments
B1 development, e.g. patients seek holistic care that addresses emotional and social needs
B1 brief additional point, e.g. cultural preferences or the appeal of 'natural' remedies increase CAM use
Answer: One reason is dissatisfaction with conventional medicine and concern about side effects, leading patients to seek CAM for more holistic care that addresses emotional and social needs; cultural preference for 'natural' remedies also contributes.

Question 5

B1 identifies one difference, e.g. biomedical focuses on biological causes like allergens or immune response
B1 explains the first difference with application, e.g. treatment would focus on medication such as inhalers
B1 identifies a second difference, e.g. social model focuses on environmental and social causes like pollution or poor housing
B1 explains the second difference with application, e.g. response would include improving housing and reducing pollution
Answer: One difference is that the biomedical model focuses on biological causes such as allergens and treats asthma with medication like inhalers; the social model focuses on environmental and social causes such as pollution or damp housing and would look to improve housing and reduce pollution as a response.

Question 6

Level 1 (1-3): Basic statements about medicalisation with little sociological detail or argument. Limited use of perspectives and no clear conclusion.
Level 2 (4-6): Some relevant sociological knowledge and at least one perspective used to explain why medicalisation can be negative or positive. Limited application or analysis and a weak or partially supported conclusion.
Level 3 (7-9): Clear knowledge of medicalisation and use of at least two differing perspectives, such as Marxist/feminist critiques and a functionalist or interactionist view. Good analysis of negative effects like iatrogenesis, expanded medical control, stigma, and also benefits such as increased access to treatment. A reasoned conclusion is present.
Level 4 (10-12): Detailed, well organised evaluation using multiple sociological perspectives and specific supporting examples, such as Illich on iatrogenesis, Zola on expansion of jurisdiction, feminist accounts of control, and evidence about improved treatments and patient rights. Analysis recognises complexities and limits, weighs arguments, and reaches a supported, balanced conclusion.
Indicative content:
- AO1 points: definition of medicalisation, Illich's iatrogenesis, Zola's expansion of medical jurisdiction, role of medical profession and pharmaceutical industry.
- AO2 points: applied examples such as childbirth interventions, ADHD diagnosis, menopause treatment, increased access to psychiatric drugs, growth of screening programmes.
- AO3 points: negative arguments including physical harm from unnecessary treatment, increased dependence on medicine, expansion of social control, stigma from labels; positive arguments including earlier diagnosis and treatment, reduced stigma in some cases through medical recognition, access to benefits and legal protections, patient empowerment and choice, improvements in life expectancy and quality of life.
- Compare perspectives: Marxist and feminist critiques focusing on power, profit and control; interactionist and Szasz highlighting social construction and labelling; functionalist view noting benefits of medical role in social order and sick role facilitating recovery.
- Consider evidence and limitations: some medicalisation brings benefits for populations, while other cases show overreach; note variation by social class, gender and ethnicity in who benefits and who is harmed.
- Conclusion: balanced judgement weighing cases where medicalisation is harmful against where medicalisation brings real health gains and social support.

Question 7

B1 identifies that medicalisation is the process by which non-medical problems become defined and treated as medical issues
B1 development, e.g. this often involves the expansion of medical authority and use of medical language or treatment
Answer: Medicalisation is the process by which non-medical problems become defined and treated as medical issues, often involving the expansion of medical authority and medical language or treatment.

Question 8

B1 identifies a correct difference, e.g. social model locates causes in social factors like poverty and housing
B1 development, e.g. links a social factor to health, such as damp housing increasing respiratory illness risk
B1 brief elaboration, e.g. contrasts this with biomedical focus on pathogens or bodily malfunction
Answer: The social model locates causes in social factors like poverty, housing and work conditions, for example damp housing can increase respiratory illness risk, whereas the biomedical model focuses on pathogens or bodily malfunction.

Question 9

B1 identifies one consequence, e.g. stigma and social exclusion
B1 explains the first consequence, e.g. labelled person may lose friendships or face discrimination at work
B1 identifies a second consequence, e.g. more access to medical treatment or bureaucratic support
B1 explains the second consequence, e.g. label may open routes to therapy, benefits or legal protection, but also medical control
Answer: One consequence is stigma and social exclusion, where a labelled person may lose friendships or face workplace discrimination; a second is increased access to medical treatment or benefits, since the label can open routes to therapy and support but also lead to greater medical surveillance.

Question 10

B1 identifies a correct effect from the item or knowledge, e.g. label can lead to stigma or change self identity
B1 explains how this happens using Item A, e.g. Mr Khan feels weak and thinks family view him negatively because he was labelled
B1 identifies a linked consequence, e.g. treatment may create side effects or dependence that alter daily life
B1 explains the linked consequence with either Item A or wider knowledge, e.g. antidepressant side effects make Mr Khan miss work, reinforcing the sick role
Answer: Labelling can produce stigma and change self identity: in Item A Mr Khan feels the 'depression' label makes him appear weak to family. The label also leads to medical treatment whose side effects cause him to miss work, reinforcing a dependent sick identity.

Question 11

B1 identifies a valid criticism, e.g. it assumes illness is temporary and that the sick can return to normal roles
B1 explains why this is a problem for chronic illness, e.g. chronic conditions may be lifelong so the sick role does not fit
B1 identifies a second element or example, e.g. ignores variations in power and inequality
B1 explains the second element, e.g. poorer patients may have less access to medical help, so obligations and exemptions differ
Answer: One criticism is that Parsons assumes illness is temporary and that people will return to normal roles, which does not fit chronic illness that may be lifelong; another is that he ignores variations in social inequality, for example poorer patients may lack access to care and so the sick role obligations and exemptions operate unequally.

Question 12

B1 identifies iatrogenesis as harm caused by medical intervention or medicine itself
B1 development, e.g. Illich argued medicine can cause social and personal harm as well as physical harm
Answer: Iatrogenesis is harm caused by medical intervention or medicine itself; Illich argued that medical treatment can produce physical, social and personal harms as well as cures.

Health: Concepts of Health, Illness and the Medicalisation of Society - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

Related topics

GSOC.AL37 Health: Concepts of Health, Illness and the Medicalisation of Society

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12

Mark your answers

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12