11+ · Topic guide

Comprehension: Non-Fiction Set 10

Comprehension: Non-Fiction Set 10 is a further unseen non-fiction extract for 11+ practice, once again testing retrieval, structure, vocabulary in context and the writer's viewpoint in the GL Assessment / CEM / CSSE style. This set uses a report-style passage, where a claim is supported by evidence, which is a common non-fiction structure worth recognising quickly.

Year 5-6 (11+)EnglishGL AssessmentCEM

Before you start

Make sure you're comfortable with these topics first:

Method

  1. Identify the main claim the passage is making in its opening sentence or two, before reading on for the evidence that supports it.
  2. Look for the specific evidence used to back up the claim, such as figures, examples or expert opinion, and note where each piece appears.
  3. For retrieval questions, quote the exact evidence given rather than a rounded or approximate version of it.
  4. For structure questions, notice whether the passage moves from claim to evidence, or from evidence to conclusion, since this affects how the argument is built.
  5. For vocabulary questions, check that your chosen synonym keeps the same shade of meaning as the original word within its sentence.
  6. Give a fuller, multi-point answer for higher-mark questions, checking that each point is a separate, clearly stated idea.

Worked example

Extract: 'Reading for pleasure has a measurable effect on academic performance. A recent survey of primary schools found that pupils who read independently for at least twenty minutes a day scored noticeably higher in reading tests than those who read rarely.' Question: How does the writer support the claim made in the first sentence? (3 marks)

  1. Identify the claim made in the first sentence: reading for pleasure has 'a measurable effect on academic performance'.
  2. Identify the evidence given to support it: a survey of primary schools comparing pupils who read at least twenty minutes a day with those who read rarely.
  3. Notice the specific detail 'twenty minutes a day', which makes the evidence precise rather than vague.
  4. Notice the outcome stated: pupils who read more 'scored noticeably higher in reading tests', directly linking the behaviour to a measurable result.
  5. Final answer: the writer supports the claim by citing a specific survey of primary schools that compared two groups of pupils, showing that those who read independently for at least twenty minutes a day scored noticeably higher in reading tests than those who read rarely, giving the general claim concrete, measurable support.

Practice questions

Type your answer and press Check to be marked straight away, or reveal the answer and mark yourself.

Q1According to the extract, how long did the higher-scoring pupils read independently each day?Show answer

Answer: At least twenty minutes a day.

Got it right?
Q2Give one word from the extract that means 'able to be measured or shown with evidence'.Show answer

Answer: 'measurable'.

Got it right?
Q3True or False: according to the extract, the survey found no link between reading for pleasure and test scores.Show answer

Answer: False - the extract says the group that read more 'scored noticeably higher in reading tests'.

Got it right?
Q4What kind of evidence does the writer use to support the opening claim: a personal opinion, an expert quotation, or a survey?Show answer

Answer: A survey (of primary schools).

Got it right?
Q5In your own words, explain what the survey mentioned in the extract found.Show answer

Answer: It found that pupils who read on their own for twenty minutes or more each day did noticeably better in reading tests than pupils who rarely read independently.

Got it right?
Q6Why might a writer choose to support a general claim with a specific survey rather than leaving the claim unsupported?Show answer

Answer: Specific evidence, such as a survey, makes a claim more convincing and harder to dismiss than an unsupported general statement.

Got it right?

Exam-style questions

Written in the style of a 11+ exam paper, with a full mark scheme.

Q1[2 marks]

Extract: 'A recent survey of primary schools found that pupils who read independently for at least twenty minutes a day scored noticeably higher in reading tests than those who read rarely.' Find and copy the phrase that shows a clear difference was found between the two groups of pupils. Then explain what this phrase tells the reader. (2 marks)

Show mark scheme

Tick each line you got. Your score builds from the marks on the scheme.

Nothing ticked yet - 2 available

Got it right?
Q2[4 marks]

Explain how the structure of the extract, moving from a general claim to specific evidence, helps to convince the reader. (4 marks)

Show mark scheme

Tick each line you got. Your score builds from the marks on the scheme.

Nothing ticked yet - 4 available

Got it right?

Free printable worksheet

Want more practice on paper? Download the comprehension: non-fiction set 10 worksheet pack - 10 pages of exam-style questions with a full mark scheme. One email opens every download in this browser for 14 days - no account, no card. Print it for personal and classroom use.

This topic is chapter 24 of 11+ English Workbook 1, the whole course as one free printable PDF.

Next topics

Ready to practise comprehension: non-fiction set 10? Add it to a printable topic pack for this student in the Pack Builder.

Add to my pack

Not quite what you needed?

Tell us what is missing on comprehension: non-fiction set 10, or which topic to write up next. Every request is read, and we reply to every one.

Build a full practice pack.

This topic is one of hundreds in the library - pick the ones a student needs and generate a printable PDF in minutes.