26 original exam-style questions - 6 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.
Source written for Revision Library (original, copyright-free).
Three hundred years ago, the sound of gnawing wood and the slap of a broad, flat tail on water would have been familiar along many British rivers. Then, within a few generations, it vanished completely. Beavers were hunted to extinction in Britain by the sixteenth century, prized for their thick waterproof fur, their meat, and a musky substance called castoreum that was once used in perfume and medicine. For hundreds of years, no beaver dam interrupted the flow of an English stream. Today, that is changing.
Since 2009, small numbers of Eurasian beavers have been released into rivers and enclosed wetlands across England, Scotland and Wales, first as closely monitored trials and, more recently, as licensed reintroductions. The animals are not merely a pleasant sight for walkers. Ecologists describe beavers as "ecosystem engineers", a term reserved for species that reshape their surroundings so drastically that entire communities of other plants and animals come to depend on the changes they make.
The engineering itself is remarkable. A single family group, usually a breeding pair and their offspring from the last two years, will fell young trees, drag branches into a stream, and pack the resulting tangle with mud and stones until the water backs up behind it. The resulting dam can be barely visible or, in a few dramatic cases, stretch for over a hundred metres and stand taller than a person. Behind each dam, a shallow pond spreads outward, slowing the current and trapping silt that would otherwise wash downstream.
This slowing effect turns out to matter a great deal to people, not only to wildlife. During heavy rainfall, a chain of beaver dams along a stream can hold back a significant volume of water, releasing it gradually over the following days rather than all at once. Researchers monitoring a beaver-engineered site in Devon recorded a reduction of more than thirty per cent in the peak flow reaching a village downstream during storms, giving flood defences and drainage systems valuable time to cope. The same ponds also act as a filter, catching soil, fertiliser and other pollutants before they reach rivers used for drinking water or fishing.
Wildlife benefits too, and often in surprising ways. The still, sunlit water behind a dam attracts dragonflies and damselflies that cannot breed in fast-flowing streams. Fish that struggle in silty water find cleaner gravel beds for spawning further upstream, protected by the settling pond below. Otters, water voles and a wide range of wetland birds have all been recorded using beaver-modified habitats in greater numbers than nearby stretches of unaltered river.
Not everyone welcomes the return of the beaver, however. Farmers whose fields border wetland sites have raised concerns about flooded pasture and gnawed crops, and some landowners worry about the cost of managing dams that block irrigation channels or damage riverside trees they value for other reasons. Conservation groups argue that these problems, though real, can usually be managed with simple measures such as fencing or devices that regulate water levels, and point out that the wider benefits to flood control and biodiversity far outweigh the local inconvenience.
What began as a cautious, closely watched experiment has grown into one of the most closely followed rewilding projects in Britain. Whether beavers spread widely across the country's waterways now depends less on the animals themselves, which reproduce readily once established, than on whether farmers, conservationists and government bodies can agree on how, and where, their engineering should be allowed to continue.