The Comprehensive System and Its Aims - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

12 original exam-style questions - 4 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.

Download PDF Jump to mark scheme (page 5)The Comprehensive System and Its Aims revision guide

This topic is chapter 8 of GCSE Sociology: Education Practice Book.

Next in this strand

4.8 The Comprehensive System and Its Aims

AQA 8192 · about 55 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions. For questions worth 3 marks or more write full sentences. Use sociological terms where relevant.

Using an example, explain one way parental choice or middle-class strategies could continue to affect equality of opportunity after comprehensivisation.

(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)

Identify and explain one methodological difficulty when using exam pass rates to judge whether comprehensives improved equality of opportunity.

(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)

State one criticism from a Marxist perspective about the comprehensive system's effect on social class inequality.

(Total for Question 3 is 3 marks)

Explain two reasons why some sociologists conclude that comprehensivisation only partially achieved equality of opportunity, giving one concrete example for each reason.

(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)

Discuss how far the move to comprehensive schooling after 1965 achieved equality of opportunity in education, taking both supporting and critical sociological perspectives into account. Refer to policy aims and evidence where possible.

(Total for Question 5 is 8 marks)

Define what sociologists mean by 'comprehensive schooling' in the context of the 1965 policy change in England and Wales.

(Total for Question 6 is 2 marks)

Identify and explain two ways critics argue comprehensives may have maintained social selection internally, after the 1965 reforms.

(Total for Question 7 is 4 marks)

Describe one administrative measure local authorities used when converting schools to the comprehensive system after 1965, for example reorganising catchment areas or closing duplicate schools.

(Total for Question 8 is 3 marks)

State one way the ending of the 11-plus exam was intended to affect social mobility in England and Wales after 1965.

(Total for Question 9 is 2 marks)

Identify one piece of evidence sociologists use to argue that comprehensives produced real meritocracy rather than merely relocating selection.

(Total for Question 10 is 4 marks)

Explain one reason why streaming within comprehensive schools can disadvantage working-class pupils.

(Total for Question 11 is 2 marks)

Which administrative policy was often used to try to prevent obvious social segregation when forming comprehensive schools from previously separate grammar and secondary modern schools?

A) Selective catchment exclusion
B) A selective 11-plus retest
C) Creating balanced intake through paired school catchments
D) Introducing school fees to limit intake

(Total for Question 12 is 1 mark)

Mark scheme · 4.8 The Comprehensive System and Its Aims

Question 1

B1 identifies a parental or middle-class strategy, e.g. moving house to a desirable catchment area, or applying for entry to a particular comprehensive
B1 explains how this affects access, e.g. securing a place in a higher-performing comprehensive or a school with more top sets
B1 applies an example, e.g. a family buying a house near a well-regarded comprehensive to increase their child's chances
B1 development, e.g. this replicates class advantage by using economic resources to secure better school opportunities
Answer: Middle-class parents can move house into a desirable catchment or use applications to get into a higher-performing comprehensive, for example buying a home near a school with strong exam results; this secures better school places and top-set access for their children, reproducing class advantage despite non-selection by exam.

Question 2

B1 identifies a difficulty, e.g. changes in exam systems, grade inflation or rising national standards over time
B1 explains how this complicates comparisons, e.g. later increases in passes may reflect broader standards or more exams rather than local school effects
B1 identifies another aspect, e.g. differences in pupil intake or social composition over time
B1 explains how intake differences confound causal claims, e.g. a school showing rising passes may have a more middle-class intake rather than have become more meritocratic
Answer: Methodological difficulties include changes in exam systems or standards and differences in pupil intake: grade rises over time may reflect national changes or inflation rather than local school effects, and higher passes can be due to a more middle-class intake rather than improved equality of opportunity.

Question 3

B1 identifies a Marxist criticism, e.g. comprehensives reproduce capitalist relations by teaching different social classes different skills and legitimising inequality
B1 development, e.g. schools sort pupils into roles useful for the economy while appearing fair
B1 brief further development, e.g. selection may be hidden in internal organisation, preserving class power
Answer: A Marxist criticism is that comprehensives reproduce capitalist relations by sorting pupils into different roles and skills useful for the economy while appearing meritocratic; internal organisation hides selection and helps preserve class power.

Question 4

B1 identifies first reason, e.g. internal selection like setting reproduces inequality
B1 provides an example and development, e.g. example: a working-class pupil put in lower sets misses A level preparation and so cannot progress
B1 identifies second reason, e.g. middle-class strategies such as house purchase and parental advocacy maintain advantage
B1 provides an example and development, e.g. example: parents move into a catchment for a high-performing comprehensive so their child gains better teachers and resources
B1 further development linking both reasons to partial achievement, e.g. these factors limit how far non-selection alone can make education fully meritocratic
B1 accurate use of sociological terms such as internal selection, social mobility, or cultural capital where appropriate
Answer: Reasons include internal selection like setting that places some working-class pupils in lower bands so they miss A level preparation, and middle-class strategies such as buying into a catchment that secures better teachers and resources; these examples show why ending the 11-plus alone could only partially achieve equality of opportunity.

Question 5

Level 1 (1-3): Basic points about comprehensives with limited development. May describe the policy aim or offer a single weak reason for or against the claim, with little evidence or sociological reference.
Level 2 (4-6): Clear discussion that balances supporting and critical points. Uses some sociological ideas such as meritocracy, internal selection, or parental choice and gives brief evidence or examples. Lacks depth in evaluation or a clear overall judgement.
Level 3 (7-8): Thorough discussion that evaluates competing perspectives. Refers to policy aims, provides evidence and examples, and explains mechanisms such as setting, parental strategies or widening access. Reaches a supported conclusion about how far comprehensives achieved equality of opportunity.
Indicative content:
- Supporting points: comprehensives ended formal 11-plus selection, widened access to academic courses, and in some areas increased working-class uptake of qualifications, which supports greater equality of opportunity.
- Critical points: internal selection via streaming and setting, middle-class strategies like moving into catchments or using influence, and differences in school resources meant selection could be relocated rather than ended.
- Sociological perspectives: functionalists might emphasise meritocratic aims and increased unity, Marxists argue class reproduction continues through hidden selection and role allocation, and feminists might note gender effects in subject choice and access.
- Evidence and examples: regional statistics showing rising O level/A level entries in some comprehensive areas, case studies of streaming outcomes, examples of parental house moves or appeals for banding, and methodological cautions about measuring opportunity using exam pass rates.
- Conclusion: a balanced judgement recognising that comprehensives made important moves towards reducing formal selection and widening access, but that equality of opportunity was limited by internal school practices and wider social inequalities, so the achievement was partial rather than complete.

Question 6

B1 identifies comprehensive schooling as non-selective secondary schooling that educates all children together regardless of 11-plus results or class
B1 development, e.g. schools organised to teach pupils of all abilities in the same institution rather than separating them into grammar and secondary modern schools
Answer: Comprehensive schooling is non-selective secondary education where children of all abilities are educated together in the same school rather than being separated by 11-plus selection into grammar and secondary modern schools.

Question 7

B1 identifies internal selection method, e.g. streaming or setting by ability within the school
B1 explains how streaming can reproduce class inequality, for example middle-class pupils more likely placed in top sets and access to better teaching
B1 identifies another internal mechanism, e.g. banding for entry to particular courses or sets for key subjects
B1 explains how banding can limit working-class pupils' curriculum choices and future qualifications, reproducing selection
Answer: Critics point to internal selection such as streaming or setting, where middle-class pupils are more likely to be placed in top groups with better teaching, and banding for access to certain courses, which can limit working-class pupils' curriculum choices and future qualifications.

Question 8

B1 identifies an administrative measure, e.g. redrawing catchment areas, merging grammar and secondary modern schools, or closing some small schools
B1 develops with a brief effect, e.g. redrawing catchment areas changed which pupils attended which schools and could alter the social mix
B1 additional development, e.g. merging schools removed the formal two-tier school structures in a local area
Answer: Local authorities reorganised catchment areas and sometimes merged or closed schools, for example combining a grammar and secondary modern into one comprehensive, which changed which pupils attended which school and altered the local social mix.

Question 9

B1 identifies a way, e.g. it was intended to increase opportunities for working-class pupils to access academic education
B1 brief development, e.g. by reducing an early gate that often diverted children into non-academic routes
Answer: The ending of the 11-plus was intended to increase opportunities for working-class pupils to access academic education by reducing an early gate that diverted many into non-academic routes.

Question 10

B1 identifies an evidence type, e.g. studies showing increased numbers of working-class pupils taking O levels or gaining qualifications in areas with comprehensives
B1 explains how this supports meritocracy, e.g. more qualifications suggest wider access to academic routes
B1 identifies supporting data, e.g. regional statistics of rising working-class progression to further education in comprehensive areas
B1 development, e.g. such trends are taken as evidence tests of improved equality of opportunity
Answer: Sociologists point to studies and regional statistics showing increased numbers of working-class pupils taking O levels or progressing to further education in areas that moved to comprehensives; rising qualification rates are used to argue comprehensives widened access and supported meritocratic outcomes.

Question 11

B1 identifies the reason, e.g. top sets often get more experienced teachers and a faster-paced, exam-focused curriculum
B1 development, e.g. if working-class pupils are disproportionately placed in lower sets they miss out on higher quality teaching and qualifications
Answer: Top sets often receive more experienced teachers and a faster-paced curriculum, so if working-class pupils are disproportionately placed in lower sets they miss out on higher quality teaching and chances to gain top qualifications.

Question 12

B1 C (creating balanced intake through paired school catchments)
Answer: C

The Comprehensive System and Its Aims - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

Next in this strand

Related topics

4.8 The Comprehensive System and Its Aims

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12

Mark your answers

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12