Marketisation, Parentocracy and School Choice - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

11 original exam-style questions - 3 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.

Download PDF Jump to mark scheme (page 4)Marketisation, Parentocracy and School Choice revision guide

This topic is chapter 9 of GCSE Sociology: Education Practice Book.

Next in this strand

4.9 Marketisation, Parentocracy and School Choice

AQA 8192 · about 55 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions. For questions worth 3 marks or more write in full sentences. Spend about 60 minutes on this paper.

Identify one example of a marketisation-related school type or status that became more common after the 1988 reforms and later policies.

(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)

Define the term 'silt-shift' as used by critics of marketisation in education.

(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)

Explain two reasons why some parents may be unable to take full advantage of school choice.

(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)

Compare how the New Right perspective and a Marxist perspective would view marketisation and school choice.

(Total for Question 4 is 4 marks)

Discuss how far sociologists would agree that marketisation of education has increased equality of opportunity, focusing on market mechanisms such as choice, league tables and inspections.

Discuss how far sociologists would agree that marketisation of education has increased equality of opportunity.

(Total for Question 5 is 12 marks)

Define the term 'parentocracy' as used in sociology of education, referring to Ball, Bowe and Gewirtz's use of the term.

(Total for Question 6 is 2 marks)

Identify one feature of 'open enrolment' policy in the context of marketisation and school choice.

(Total for Question 7 is 2 marks)

Explain two ways league tables are intended to influence schools under marketisation policies for education since 1988.

(Total for Question 8 is 4 marks)

Identify one stated aim of marketisation policies in education introduced from the late 1980s onwards.

(Total for Question 9 is 2 marks)

Describe two ways schools might respond to market pressures created by choice and league tables.

(Total for Question 10 is 4 marks)

Explain one criticism that suggests marketisation increases class inequality in education.

(Total for Question 11 is 4 marks)

Mark scheme · 4.9 Marketisation, Parentocracy and School Choice

Question 1

B1 identifies a correct example, e.g. grant-maintained schools or academy status as types linked to marketisation
B1 brief development, e.g. such statuses gave schools greater autonomy and increased competition
Answer: An example is grant-maintained schools, and later academy status, which gave schools greater autonomy and increased competition.

Question 2

B1 identifies silt-shift as the process where disadvantaged or lower-achieving pupils are concentrated in certain schools
B1 development, e.g. this happens when selective schools take the most advantaged pupils, leaving others 'silted' with harder-to-teach intakes
Answer: Silt-shift is the process where disadvantaged or lower-achieving pupils become concentrated in certain schools because selective or successful schools take the most advantaged pupils, leaving others with more challenging intakes.

Question 3

B1 identifies one reason, e.g. lack of economic resources such as money for transport or to move house
B1 development of first reason, e.g. this limits the practical ability to access popular schools outside the local area
B1 identifies second reason, e.g. lack of cultural or informational capital to interpret league tables, fill forms or use social networks
B1 development of second reason, e.g. parents with less education may not know which questions to ask or how to navigate admissions procedures
Answer: Some parents cannot take full advantage of choice because they lack economic resources, like money for transport or to move house, limiting access to popular schools; they may also lack cultural or informational capital to interpret league tables, fill forms or use networks, making admissions harder to navigate.

Question 4

B1 identifies New Right view, e.g. supports marketisation as increasing efficiency and standards through competition
B1 identifies Marxist view, e.g. sees marketisation as reproducing class inequalities and benefiting ruling-class interests
B1 explains New Right rationale, e.g. parents acting as consumers force schools to improve
B1 explains Marxist rationale, e.g. choice advantages privileged families and helps legitimize unequal outcomes as 'fair' market results
Answer: The New Right supports marketisation, arguing competition and parental choice increase efficiency and standards as parents act like consumers; Marxists argue marketisation reproduces class inequalities, advantaging privileged families and legitimising unequal outcomes as if they result from fair market processes.

Question 5

Level 1 (1-3): Simple statements about marketisation with little or no sociological explanation, or an unbalanced description of one side only.
Level 2 (4-6): Clear explanation of one or two relevant sociological arguments about marketisation and equality of opportunity, with some use of evidence or examples, limited evaluation.
Level 3 (7-9): Developed analysis using competing sociological perspectives and examples, showing awareness of how market mechanisms have both positive and negative effects on equality of opportunity.
Level 4 (10-12): Thorough, balanced discussion drawing on several sociological perspectives and specific evidence, with a supported judgement on the extent to which marketisation has increased equality of opportunity.
Indicative content:
- Arguments that marketisation increases equality: New Right claim that parental choice and competition drive up standards, giving parents power to choose better schools and rewarding effective schools; league tables and Ofsted provide transparent performance data so parents can make informed choices; some disadvantaged pupils may gain from improved schools and targeted interventions in competition-driven contexts.
- Arguments that marketisation reduces equality: Ball, Bowe and Gewirtz and other critics argue parentocracy privileges middle-class parents who have economic and cultural capital to choose, leading to cream skimming and silt-shift; league tables can stigmatise struggling schools and concentrate disadvantaged pupils; selective admissions, marketing and resource differences increase segregation by class and reduce genuine equality of opportunity.
- Empirical and practical considerations: evidence that oversubscribed schools are dominated by pupils from advantaged backgrounds, that academy or autonomous status can lead to variable outcomes, and that Ofsted pressure can lead to short-term improvements but also to teaching to the test and exclusion of challenging pupils.
- Perspectives to use: New Right supportive view, Marxist and critical sociologists highlighting reproduction of class inequality, Ball et al. on parentocracy, and feminist or interactionist comments on how choice affects different social groups in varied ways.
- Possible judgement: balanced conclusion that marketisation has produced some improvements in choice and accountability but overall has tended to increase inequalities because advantaged families benefit most; extent of agreement depends on which sociological perspective is used and on how equality of opportunity is defined.

Question 6

B1 identifies parentocracy as a system where parents are given power to choose schools, with choice supposedly driving school improvement (oe)
B1 development, e.g. credits Ball, Bowe and Gewirtz in noting this idea can mask inequalities between parents in the ability to choose
Answer: Parentocracy describes a system where parents are given power to choose schools, with the idea that parental choice drives school improvement; Ball, Bowe and Gewirtz note it can mask unequal ability among parents to exercise choice.

Question 7

B1 identifies a correct feature, e.g. pupils can apply to schools outside their local catchment area
B1 brief development, e.g. this increases competition between schools for pupil places
Answer: Open enrolment allows pupils to apply to schools outside their local catchment area, increasing competition between schools for pupil places.

Question 8

B1 identifies one way, e.g. to provide parents with information to compare school performance
B1 development of first way, e.g. so parents can choose higher performing schools, creating demand incentives
B1 identifies second way, e.g. to pressure schools to raise standards to improve their published position
B1 development of second way, e.g. lower-ranked schools may change practices or recruit differently to improve results
Answer: League tables are meant to give parents information to compare school performance so they can choose higher performing schools, creating demand incentives; they also pressure schools to raise standards to improve their published position, leading some schools to change practices or recruitment.

Question 9

B1 identifies an aim, e.g. to raise educational standards through competition
B1 brief development, e.g. by giving parents choice and by using performance information to reward successful schools
Answer: An aim was to raise educational standards through competition, by giving parents choice and using performance information to reward successful schools.

Question 10

B1 identifies one response, e.g. focusing resources on subjects that improve league table measures
B1 development of first response, e.g. setting more exam-focused teaching or revision classes
B1 identifies second response, e.g. selective admissions practices or marketing to attract desirable pupils
B1 development of second response, e.g. highlighting successes in publicity to boost reputation and applications
Answer: Schools may focus resources on subjects that improve league table measures, for example using exam-focused teaching and revision classes; they may also adopt selective admissions practices or market themselves to attract desirable pupils, highlighting successes to boost reputation and applications.

Question 11

B1 identifies a criticism, e.g. choice benefits more advantaged parents who have information, money and social networks
B1 development, e.g. these parents can move, use private transport, pay for tutoring or navigate admissions to secure places
B1 links criticism to consequence, e.g. less advantaged families remain in lower performing schools, widening attainment gaps
B1 further development, e.g. marketisation can lead to cream skimming by successful schools, increasing segregation by class
Answer: Critics argue marketisation benefits more advantaged parents who have the information, money and networks to choose schools; they can move house, pay for tutoring or navigate admissions, while less advantaged families remain in lower performing schools, widening attainment gaps. Successful schools may cream skim, increasing class segregation.

Marketisation, Parentocracy and School Choice - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

Next in this strand

Related topics

4.9 Marketisation, Parentocracy and School Choice

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Mark your answers

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11