Pluralist and Elite Theories of Power - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

12 original exam-style questions - 4 pages of questions with a full mark scheme - free printable PDF.

Download PDF Jump to mark scheme (page 5)Pluralist and Elite Theories of Power revision guide

This topic is chapter 10 of GCSE Sociology: Social stratification Practice Book.

Next in this strand

6.10 Pluralist and Elite Theories of Power

AQA 8192 · about 50 minutes

Total Marks

Name: _______________________________ Date: ____ / ____ / ______

Answer ALL questions. For short answer questions, write in full sentences for questions worth 2 marks or more. Spend about 60 minutes in total.

Explain two differences between pluralist and elite theories of power in how they view the distribution of power in Britain.

(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)

State one piece of evidence someone who supports elite theory might use to argue elites control policy in Britain.

(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)

Explain one way that lobbying by professional lobbyists differs from grassroots campaigning by ordinary citizens, and give one implication for who gains influence in Britain.

(Total for Question 3 is 2 marks)

Identify and explain two ways in which pluralist theory allows for ordinary citizens to influence decisions in Britain, using different mechanisms for each way.

(Total for Question 4 is 4 marks)

Discuss how far power in Britain is genuinely shared between different groups such as political parties, sectional and cause pressure groups, and the media. In your answer, make reference to both pluralist and elite perspectives and reach a reasoned conclusion about which offers the stronger explanation.

(Total for Question 5 is 8 marks)

Define what sociologists mean by an 'elite' in the context of elite theories of power in Britain, referring to the kinds of positions such a group may hold.

(Total for Question 6 is 2 marks)

Identify one feature of pluralist democracy in Britain that is intended to allow ordinary citizens to influence decisions, and briefly explain how it helps.

(Total for Question 7 is 2 marks)

Explain two ways cause pressure groups, such as environmental campaigns in Britain, try to influence public opinion and policymakers. Give an example of each method.

(Total for Question 8 is 4 marks)

Identify one argument elite theorists use to claim ordinary citizens have limited real influence over decisions in Britain.

(Total for Question 9 is 2 marks)

Identify and explain one way that the mass media, in pluralist accounts, helps ordinary citizens influence policy in Britain.

(Total for Question 10 is 4 marks)

State one limitation of relying on voting as a way for ordinary citizens to influence government in Britain, from either perspective.

(Total for Question 11 is 2 marks)

Using the idea of C. Wright Mills' 'power elite', identify and explain one mechanism by which business leaders might exert influence over government policy in Britain.

(Total for Question 12 is 4 marks)

Mark scheme · 6.10 Pluralist and Elite Theories of Power

Question 1

B1 identifies a first difference, e.g. pluralists see power dispersed, elite theorists see it concentrated
B1 development of first difference
B1 identifies a second difference, e.g. pluralists emphasise competition and compromise, elites emphasise decision-making by a connected minority
B1 development of second difference
Answer: Pluralists see power as dispersed among competing groups and claim policy reflects compromise, while elite theorists argue power is concentrated in a connected minority who make major decisions. Pluralists emphasise competition and influence by many groups, whereas elites emphasise shared interests and networks among powerful leaders.

Question 2

B1 identifies evidence, e.g. examples of senior politicians, top military figures and business leaders sharing social ties and making common policy decisions
B1 brief development, e.g. this network of personal ties suggests coordinated influence beyond democratic accountability
Answer: Examples of senior politicians, top military figures and business leaders sharing social ties and making common policy decisions; this suggests coordinated influence beyond ordinary democratic accountability.

Question 3

B1 identifies a difference, e.g. lobbyists have expert knowledge and regular access to policymakers while grassroots campaigns rely on public mobilisation
B1 development, e.g. implication is that organised, well-funded actors can secure more direct influence than uncoordinated citizen action
Answer: Lobbyists have expert knowledge and regular access to policymakers, whereas grassroots campaigns rely on public mobilisation; this implies organised, well funded actors can secure more direct influence than uncoordinated citizen action.

Question 4

B1 identifies first way, e.g. voting in free elections
B1 development of first way, e.g. choosing representatives who reflect public views
B1 identifies second way, e.g. joining pressure groups or campaigns
B1 development of second way, e.g. pressure groups aggregate views and lobby to change policy between elections
Answer: Citizens can vote in free elections to choose representatives who reflect public views, and they can join pressure groups or campaigns which aggregate views and lobby to change policy between elections.

Question 5

Level 1 (1-2): Basic statement about pluralist or elite views with little explanation or no conclusion
Level 2 (3-5): Clear description of both pluralist and elite positions and some explanation of how each accounts for sharing or concentration of power, but limited evaluation or an unbalanced conclusion
Level 3 (6-8): Balanced analysis comparing pluralist and elite accounts, evaluation of strengths and limits of each using specific examples, and a supported conclusion about which explanation is more convincing overall
Indicative content:
- Pluralist view: power is dispersed among many groups, political parties, sectional groups and cause groups compete and compromise, media gives voice to different interests, elections allow citizen influence
- Evidence for pluralism: examples of successful campaigns by environmental groups or trade unions that led to policy change, media coverage forcing government inquiries
- Elite view: C. Wright Mills argument that a power elite of political, military and business leaders hold real power, networks and revolving doors concentrate influence
- Evidence for elite theory: examples of close ties between business and government, influential think tanks, large corporate lobbying and donations that shape policy priorities
- Evaluation points: pluralism explains diversity of voices and some genuine influence, but may underestimate resource inequalities and insider access; elite theory highlights concentration and coordination but may underplay pluralist competition and occasional policy shifts driven by public pressure
- Conclusion: weigh evidence, acknowledge mixed reality that some areas show pluralist competition while key decisions may be steered by elite networks, give a judgement on which explanation is stronger with reasons

Question 6

B1 identifies an elite as a relatively small, interconnected group with disproportionate power or influence (oe)
B1 development, e.g. often made up of political, economic and military or corporate leaders who have close links
Answer: An elite is a relatively small, interconnected group with disproportionate power or influence, often made up of political, economic and military or corporate leaders who have close links.

Question 7

B1 identifies a feature, e.g. free and regular elections where citizens vote
B1 brief development, e.g. voting allows citizens to choose representatives and influence policy indirectly
Answer: Free and regular elections where citizens vote, allowing them to choose representatives and influence policy indirectly by changing which party or MPs hold power.

Question 8

B1 identifies one method, e.g. media campaigns or public demonstrations
B1 development, e.g. media coverage and demonstrations raise public awareness and put issues on the political agenda
B1 identifies a second method, e.g. petitions and lobbying MPs or ministers
B1 development, e.g. petitions and direct lobbying can lead policymakers to respond or consult on proposed changes
Answer: Cause groups use media campaigns and demonstrations to raise awareness and put issues on the political agenda, and use petitions and lobbying of MPs or ministers to push for specific policy responses.

Question 9

B1 identifies an elite-style argument, e.g. decisions are made by a small interconnected group regardless of elections
B1 development, e.g. this reduces the impact of ordinary citizens voting or campaigning because elite networks steer major choices
Answer: Elite theorists argue decisions are made by a small interconnected group regardless of elections, which reduces the impact of ordinary citizens voting or campaigning because elite networks steer major choices.

Question 10

B1 identifies a media role, e.g. reporting issues and providing a platform for debate
B1 explains how this can influence policymakers, e.g. wide coverage can increase public pressure on politicians to respond
B1 identifies a second linked point, e.g. media helps frame issues and set the political agenda
B1 development, e.g. agenda setting can prioritise issues for government attention and consultation
Answer: The media reports issues and provides a platform for debate, which can increase public pressure on politicians to respond. The media also frames issues and sets the political agenda, prioritising topics for government attention.

Question 11

B1 identifies a limitation, e.g. low turnout or that elections occur only occasionally
B1 brief development, e.g. low turnout means many citizens do not take part and occasional elections limit how quickly citizens can respond to policy
Answer: A limitation is low voter turnout and that elections only happen occasionally, so many citizens do not take part and elections limit how quickly the public can change policy between contests.

Question 12

B1 identifies a mechanism, e.g. revolving doors between business and government or direct lobbying
B1 explains how it works, e.g. revolving doors create personal networks and shared interests which shape policy choices
B1 identifies a second linked point, e.g. large donations or funding of think tanks
B1 development, e.g. donations and funded research can shape political priorities and the evidence base used in decisions
Answer: Business leaders may use revolving doors and direct lobbying, creating personal networks and shared interests that shape policy choices. They may also provide donations or fund think tanks, shaping political priorities and the evidence used in decisions.

Pluralist and Elite Theories of Power - Worksheets, Questions and Revision

Next in this strand

Related topics

6.10 Pluralist and Elite Theories of Power

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12

Mark your answers

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Question 5

Question 6

Question 7

Question 8

Question 9

Question 10

Question 11

Question 12