Answer ALL questions. At least four of your answers should be written in full sentences where indicated. Use sociological terms such as social model, medical model, discrimination, and life chances where relevant.
1
Describe two workplace barriers disabled employees may face in Britain that limit their career progression.
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2
Identify and explain one government policy or employer practice in Britain intended to reduce inequality for disabled people, and explain how it helps improve life chances.
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3
Give one concrete example of discrimination in recruitment experienced by disabled applicants in Britain.
(Total for Question 3 is 2 marks)
4
Describe one strength of the social model of disability for understanding inequality experienced by disabled people in Britain.
(Total for Question 4 is 3 marks)
5
Describe one criticism of the medical model of disability when applied to social policy in Britain.
(Total for Question 5 is 3 marks)
6
In the context of inequality based on disability in Britain, discuss how far sociologists would agree that disability has a major effect on a person's life chances. In your answer, refer to relevant sociological perspectives and evidence and reach a supported conclusion.
Discuss how far sociologists would agree that disability has a major effect on a person's life chances in Britain today.
(Total for Question 6 is 12 marks)
7
Define the term 'medical model of disability' as used in British sociology and policy debates.
(Total for Question 7 is 2 marks)
8
Describe one way the extra costs associated with disability can increase the risk of poverty for a disabled person living in Britain.
(Total for Question 8 is 3 marks)
9
Define what sociologists mean by 'life chances' in the context of disability in Britain.
(Total for Question 9 is 2 marks)
10
Define what the social model of disability claims about the cause of disability-related disadvantage in Britain.
(Total for Question 10 is 2 marks)
11
Item A: A small survey of 120 disabled people in a UK town found 38% reported employers refusing to interview them because of their disability, 46% reported extra monthly costs for specialist equipment averaging £95, and 22% reported being offered only part-time roles when they sought full-time work. Using Item A and your sociological knowledge, explain two ways these findings could reduce life chances for disabled people in that town.
(Total for Question 11 is 4 marks)
12
Explain one way that disability can compound disadvantage for someone already on a low income in Britain.
(Total for Question 12 is 2 marks)
Mark scheme · 6.11 Inequality Based on Disability and Other Social Divisions
Question 1
B1 identifies a barrier, e.g. inaccessible premises or lack of equipment
B1 development of that barrier, e.g. inability to access certain roles or training limits promotion prospects
B1 identifies a second barrier, e.g. inflexible working hours or lack of reasonable adjustments
B1 development of that barrier, e.g. inability to balance health needs and work reduces opportunities for responsibility and promotion
Answer: Inaccessible premises or lack of assistive equipment can prevent access to certain roles or training and limit promotion; inflexible hours or lack of reasonable adjustments make balancing health and work difficult, reducing opportunities to take on responsibility and advance.
Question 2
B1 identifies a correct policy or practice, e.g. the Equality Act requiring reasonable adjustments
B1 explains the policy or practice, e.g. employers must make adjustments such as flexible hours, accessible premises or adapted equipment
B1 explains how it helps life chances, e.g. reasonable adjustments increase access to jobs and retention, improving income and career prospects
B1 further development, e.g. legal protection can also reduce discrimination in recruitment and promotion
Answer: The Equality Act requires reasonable adjustments, such as flexible hours, accessible premises or adapted equipment; these adjustments increase access to jobs and help retention, improving income and career prospects, while legal protections help reduce discrimination in recruitment and promotion.
Question 3
B1 identifies a concrete example, e.g. job adverts saying 'must be able to travel without assistance' excluding some disabled applicants
B1 brief development, e.g. this acts as a filter to exclude applicants before interviews
Answer: A job advert stating 'must be able to travel without assistance' excludes some disabled applicants, acting as a filter that prevents them reaching interview stages.
Question 4
B1 identifies a strength, e.g. focuses attention on changing social structures and barriers
B1 development, e.g. points to practical solutions like accessible design and inclusive policies
B1 further development, e.g. empowers disabled people and supports collective rights-based approaches
Answer: The social model focuses attention on social structures and barriers and points to practical solutions like accessible design and inclusive policies, which can empower disabled people and support rights-based collective action.
Question 5
B1 identifies a criticism, e.g. overemphasis on cure and individual deficit
B1 development, e.g. this can lead to policies that ignore social barriers and fail to provide reasonable adjustments
B1 further development, e.g. can stigmatise disabled people as problems to be fixed rather than rights holders
Answer: The medical model overemphasises cure and individual deficit, leading to policies that ignore social barriers and fail to provide reasonable adjustments, and it can stigmatise disabled people as problems to be fixed rather than rights holders.
Question 6
Level 1 (1-3): Basic statements about disability and life chances with little development or sociological detail.
Level 2 (4-6): Some developed points using sociological ideas, for example naming the social and medical models and giving limited evidence of how disability affects employment or income.
Level 3 (7-9): Clear explanation and comparison of sociological perspectives, such as social model, medical model and relevant feminist or Marxist arguments, with appropriate evidence on barriers, extra costs and discrimination.
Level 4 (10-12): A balanced, well-developed evaluation using competing sociological perspectives, detailed evidence about how disability affects employment, poverty and participation, consideration of policies such as the Equality Act and reasonable adjustments, and a reasoned conclusion on the extent of agreement among sociologists.
Indicative content:
Social model view: disability mainly reduces life chances because society creates barriers such as inaccessible buildings, lack of reasonable adjustments, and negative attitudes which limit education, employment and social participation.
Medical model view: some sociologists and policy-makers focus on impairment and medical treatment, arguing that personal limitations explain reduced life chances, and that medical intervention can improve outcomes.
Marxist or economic perspectives: discuss how capitalism and labour market structures can disadvantage disabled people through insecure, low-paid work and employer cost concerns.
Feminist intersectional points: disability can compound other disadvantages such as poverty, gender or age, making life chances worse for some groups.
Empirical evidence: statistics and studies showing higher poverty rates among disabled households, employment gaps, extra costs of disability, and reports of recruitment discrimination and workplace barriers.
Policy responses: the Equality Act and requirements for reasonable adjustments, welfare benefits and Access to Work schemes as mechanisms that can improve life chances, but also critiques that implementation is inconsistent.
Evaluation points: consider variation within disabled people, the role of impairment severity, employer attitudes, local services, and the idea that disability does not automatically determine life chances but interacts with other social factors.
Conclusion: on balance many sociologists agree disability affects life chances significantly because of social barriers, but there is debate about the extent and the role of individual impairment versus social structures; a supported judgement should be given.
Question 7
B1 identifies that the medical model treats disability as an individual problem or deficit located in the person
B1 development, e.g. emphasis on treatment, cure or rehabilitation to make the person fit social expectations
Answer: The medical model treats disability as an individual problem or deficit located in the person, with emphasis on treatment, cure or rehabilitation to make the person fit social expectations.
Question 8
B1 identifies an extra cost, e.g. specialist equipment, adaptations or personal care
B1 development, e.g. these costs increase household spending compared with a non-disabled household
B1 further development, e.g. if benefits do not cover these costs, the household is more likely to fall into or remain in poverty
Answer: Specialist equipment, housing adaptations or personal care increase household spending compared with non-disabled households; if benefits and incomes do not cover these extra costs, the household is more likely to fall into or remain in poverty.
Question 9
B1 identifies life chances as the opportunities a person has to improve their quality of life and achieve goals
B1 development, e.g. includes access to education, employment, housing, health care and social participation
Answer: Life chances are the opportunities a person has to improve their quality of life and achieve goals, including access to education, employment, housing, health care and social participation.
Question 10
B1 identifies claim that disadvantage is caused by social barriers and lack of accommodation, not by impairment alone
B1 development, e.g. examples include inaccessible buildings, inflexible working practices and negative attitudes
Answer: The social model claims that disadvantage is caused by social barriers and lack of accommodation rather than by impairment alone, for example inaccessible buildings, inflexible work practices and negative attitudes.
Question 11
B1 identifies a way drawn from Item A, e.g. employers refusing to interview limits access to jobs
B1 explains the effect, e.g. fewer interviews reduce chances of employment, lowering income and career prospects
B1 identifies a second way drawn from Item A, e.g. extra monthly costs of ~£95 reduce disposable income
B1 explains the effect, e.g. higher living costs increase poverty risk and reduce ability to afford services that improve life chances
Answer: Employers refusing to interview disabled applicants directly limits their access to jobs, reducing income and career prospects; extra monthly costs averaging £95 reduce disposable income and make it harder to afford services or savings that improve life chances.
Question 12
B1 identifies a relevant mechanism, e.g. extra costs of disability add to existing low income
B1 development, e.g. low-income household cannot absorb extra costs so poverty is deeper or more long-term
Answer: Extra costs of disability add to an already low income, and a low-income household cannot absorb these extra costs, so poverty becomes deeper or more long-term.