Grammar schools / Sutton boys' Stage 2 English (written) / Mock 6

Sutton Boys' Second Stage Examination · Second Stage

Sutton Boys' Second Stage English Mock Paper 6

Preparation for the Sutton Boys' Second Stage Examination, sat for admission to Wilson's School, Sutton Grammar School and Wallington County Grammar School. This is an original mock paper written by Revision Library. It is not a past paper and it is not an official specimen.

Print the paper (PDF)Paper and mark scheme (PDF)

Time allowed
50 minutes
Total marks
30
Questions
1
Level
Strong candidate
  • You have 50 minutes. There is one task on this paper and it is worth 30 marks.
  • Read the stimulus material and then the task itself twice before you begin. Everything you have to do is written down for you.
  • Spend the first five to ten minutes planning, and plan on the paper rather than in your head. Planning is never marked as writing and crossing it out costs you nothing.
  • Write in continuous prose on the lined pages. Use headings only if the form you have been asked for normally has them.
  • Keep the last five minutes to read your work back for spelling, punctuation and sense. Your handwriting should stay readable when you are writing at speed.
  • This is a practice paper written for Revision Library. Wilson's, Sutton Grammar and Wallington County Grammar release no specimen papers, so the task type here follows consistent independent accounts of the real examination rather than any published material.

English

Read the extract below, then answer the task that follows it. Write your answer on the lined pages.

  1. 130 marks

    Stimulus: an extract from a story, told by Nell

    My brother stood in the wings of the village hall with his trumpet under his arm and would not go on. The compere said his name twice. Mum was in the third row with the camera already up. I could see the back of Theo's neck going red above his collar, and then he pushed the trumpet at me, said two words, and walked out through the fire door into the car park. He did not come back until the interval, and by then somebody's grandmother was singing.

    Task: write about the same evening from Theo's point of view, in the first person, as though he were telling it. You may not change what happens. You may only change whose eyes the reader sees it through.

    Planning: decide what Theo knows that Nell cannot possibly know, and plan the place where your reader will find it out. Your writing must cover the same events in the same order, make his reasons clear without him announcing them in a single tidy sentence, and keep every detail of the extract true.

    The marks follow the task instructions, the planning underneath the piece, the quality of the writing itself and the range and accuracy of the vocabulary.

    Spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Answers, mark scheme and worked explanations
  1. 130 marks

    Following the task (8 marks)

    • Written in the first person as Theo, and consistent with it from the opening word.
    • Every fact from the extract survives: the wings, the trumpet, the compere, the camera, the fire door, the interval.
    • The same events occur in the same order, with nothing added that the extract rules out.
    • The reasons behind Theo's refusal are conveyed rather than declared.

    Planning and structure (7 marks)

    • The interior story is shaped: pressure builds, the decision arrives, and the aftermath in the car park is given its own weight.
    • The reader learns why at the point the writer chose, rather than in the first line by accident.
    • The piece ends at the interval and knows that it is ending.

    Quality of writing and vocabulary (9 marks)

    • Thought, memory and physical sensation are used to do what an outside view could not.
    • Details from Nell's account reappear transformed, so the hot neck is felt rather than observed.
    • Vocabulary is exact about feeling without reaching for the obvious words for panic.

    Technical accuracy (6 marks)

    • First person and past tense are held steady throughout.
    • Sentence boundaries are secure even where the writing imitates a racing mind.
    • Spelling, apostrophes and speech punctuation are accurate and the handwriting is clear.

    Viewpoint writing is not the same as retelling. Nell has given you the outside of the evening, and everything she reports is fixed: the trumpet under the arm, the name called twice, the camera in the third row, the red neck, the two words, the fire door, the car park, the interval, the grandmother singing. Your job is to supply the inside, and to leave the outside exactly where she left it. Any answer that has Theo play brilliantly, or that moves the fire door to the end, has failed the largest band on the paper before the writing is even judged.

    The whole task turns on one question: why would a boy who has practised, carried his trumpet to the hall and stood in the wings refuse to walk on? You do not have to give the reader the answer in a sentence. In fact the instruction tells you not to. You show it. Perhaps he can hear that the hall has gone quiet in the wrong way. Perhaps the camera is the problem, not the audience. Perhaps he played this piece for somebody who is not in the room tonight. Choose one reason, and let it surface in a memory, an object, or the thing he notices when everybody else is noticing him.

    The best trick available to you is to take Nell's outside details and give them their inside. She saw the back of his neck go red; he feels his collar turn into a hand. She saw him push the trumpet at her and say two words; he hears his own voice come out flat and wrong and knows immediately that he has just given his sister a problem. She saw him come back at the interval; he can tell you about the twenty minutes in the car park that she never witnessed, which is the one stretch of the evening where you are free.

    Three things regularly cost marks. Writing Nell's paragraph again with the pronouns swapped shows no understanding of viewpoint at all. Opening with a sentence such as I refused to go on stage because I was too nervous throws away the whole piece in one line, because the reader now has nothing to discover. And making Theo either a villain or a hero flattens him; the interesting version is a boy who cannot fully explain it to himself either.

    Timing: spend seven minutes planning, and use them on the reason and on where it appears rather than on the events, which are already decided for you. Write for around twenty-eight minutes. Leave five minutes to check that you have not slipped into the third person anywhere and that the events still match the extract line by line.

Sutton Boys' Second Stage Examination, Second Stage, English (written). Written by Revision Library on 2026-08-28, independent check pending.

The rest of the set

Free 11+ mock papers, no login

Original papers with full mark schemes and worked explanations, printable as PDFs.